Download PDF
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(04): E487-E496
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-102648
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prospective international multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Mouen A. Khashab
1   Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
Schalk Van der Merwe
2   Department of Hepatology, Division of Liver, and Pancreatico-Biliary Disorders, University Hospital Gastuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven Belgium
,
Rastislav Kunda
3   Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Mohamad H. El Zein
1   Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
Anthony Y. Teoh
4   Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
,
Fernando P. Marson
5   Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
,
Carlo Fabbri
6   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, AUSL Bologna Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
,
Ilaria Tarantino
7   Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
,
Shyam Varadarajulu
8   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA
,
Rani J. Modayil
9   Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA
,
Stavros N. Stavropoulos
9   Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA
,
Irene Peñas
10   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
Saowanee Ngamruengphong
1   Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
Vivek Kumbhari
1   Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
Joseph Romagnuolo
11   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
,
Raj Shah
12   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
,
Anthony N. Kalloo
1   Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
Manuel Perez-Miranda
10   Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
,
Everson L. Artifon
5   Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 04 August 2015

accepted after revision 22 January 2016

Publication Date:
30 March 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Endoscopy International Open – recently publishedEndoscopy 2016; 48(05): 501-501
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106156

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative to traditional radiologic and surgical drainage procedures after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, prospective multicenter data are lacking. The aims of this study were to prospectively assess the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients at 12 tertiary centers (5 US, 5 European, 1 Asian, 1 South American) with malignant distal biliary obstruction and failed ERCP underwent EUS-BD. Technical success was defined as successful stent placement in the desired position. Clinical success was defined as a reduction in bilirubin by 50 % at 2 weeks or to below 3 mg/dL at 4 weeks. Adverse events were prospectively tracked and graded according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon’s severity grading system. Overall survival and duration of stent patency were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 96 patients (mean age 66 years, female 45 %, pancreatic cancer 55 %) underwent EUS-BD. Stent placement (technical success) was achieved in 92 (95.8 %) patients (metallic stent 84, plastic stent 8). Mean procedure time was 40 minutes. Clinical success was achieved in 86 (89.5 %) patients. A total of 10 (10.5 %) adverse events occurred: pneumoperitoneum (n = 2), sheared wire (n = 1), bleeding (n = 1), bile leak (n = 3), cholangitis (n = 2), and unintentional perforation (n = 1); 4 graded as mild, 4 moderate, 1 severe, and 1 fatal (due to perforation). A total of 38 (44 %) patients died of disease progression during the study period. The median patient survival was 167 days (95 %CI 112 – 221) days. The 6-month stent patency rate was 95 % (95 %CI 94.94 – 95.06 %) and the 1-year stent patency was 86 % (95 %CI 85.74 – 86.26 %).

Conclusion: This study on EUS-BD demonstrates excellent efficacy and safety of EUS-BD when performed by experts.

Study registration: NCT01889953

 

  • References

  • 1 Khashab MA, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasonography as a therapeutic modality. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28: 467-476
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 557-565
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Wiersema M. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 102-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 898-900
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kahaleh M, Hernandez AJ, Tokar J et al. Interventional EUS-guided cholangiography: evaluation of a technique in evolution. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 52-59
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Maranki J, Hernandez AJ, Arslan B et al. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangiography: long-term experience of an emerging alternative to percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 532-538
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kim YS, Gupta K, Mallery S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound rendezvous for bile duct access using a transduodenal approach: cumulative experience at a single center. A case series. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 496-502
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Fuccio L et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with placement of a new partially covered biliary stent for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a case series. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 438-441
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Komaki T, Kitano M, Sakamoto H et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: evaluation of a choledochoduodenostomy technique. Pancreatology 2011; 11: 47-51
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1276-1284
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y et al. Prospective clinical study of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant lower biliary tract obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1239-1245
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Iwashita T, Lee JG, Shinoura S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous for biliary access after failed cannulation. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 60-65
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Khashab M, Fujii LL, Baron TH et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant biliary obstruction with an indwelling duodenal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 209-213
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Henry WA, Singh VK, Kalloo AN et al. Simultaneous EUS-guided transbulbar pancreaticobiliary drainage (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1065-1067
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Dhir V, Bhandari S, Bapat M et al. Comparison of EUS-guided rendezvous and precut papillotomy techniques for biliary access (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 354-359
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Shah JN, Marson F, Weilert F et al. Single-operator, single-session EUS-guided anterograde cholangiopancreatography in failed ERCP or inaccessible papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 56-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Itoi T, Yamao K. EUS 2008 Working Group document: evaluation of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 8-12
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Savides TJ, Varadarajulu S, Palazzo L. EUS 2008 Working Group document: evaluation of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 3-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Artifon EL, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Ferreira FC et al. EUS-guided antegrade transhepatic placement of a self-expandable metal stent in hepatico-jejunal anastomosis. JOP 2011; 12: 610-613
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nguyen-Tang T, Binmoeller KF, Sanchez-Yague A et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transhepatic anterograde self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement across malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 232-236
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Saxena P, Kumbhari V, Zein ME et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with antegrade transpapillary placement of a metal biliary stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1010-1011
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Khashab MA. EUS-guided biliary drainage made safer by a combination of hepaticogastrostomy and antegrade transpapillary stenting. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1015-1016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Mutignani M, Tringali A, Shah SG et al. Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 440-447
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Khashab MA, Dewitt J. EUS-guided biliary drainage: is it ready for prime time?. Yes! Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 102-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 768-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Park do H, Jeong SU, Lee BU et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 91-101
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M et al. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: Is there any difference?. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 950-959
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hamada T, Isayama H, Nakai Y et al. Transmural biliary drainage can be an alternative to transpapillary drainage in patients with an indwelling duodenal stent. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 1931-1938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Telford JJ, Carr-Locke DL, Baron TH et al. A randomized trial comparing uncovered and partially covered self-expandable metal stents in the palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 907-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Modayil R et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage by using a standardized approach for malignant biliary obstruction: rendezvous versus direct transluminal techniques (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 734-741
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Dhir V, Artifon EL, Gupta K et al. Multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided expandable biliary metal stent placement: Choice of access route, direction of stent insertion, and drainage route. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 430-435
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Vila JJ, Perez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1133-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar