ReviewHypospadias: Interactions between environment and genetics
Section snippets
Genetic background
Before evaluating the role of the environment, it should be acknowledged that several arguments are in favor of a predominant role for the genetic background. Familial clustering is seen in about 10% of the cases (Chen and Woolley, 1971, Czeizel et al., 1979, Kallen et al., 1986, Fredell et al., 2002), and the recurrence risk in the male siblings of an affected patient is about 15% (Bauer et al., 1979, Stoll et al., 1990, Asklund et al., 2007). Seven percent of the fathers of children with
Arguments for an environmental contribution
Several findings in both animal and human studies raise suspicion of an environmental contribution to this malformation. Hypospadias, whether associated with micropenis or not, has been reported in numerous wildlife species when the habitat is contaminated by pesticides (Hayes et al., 2002). The effects of prenatal xenoestrogens on animal male reproductive tract development have been studied by several groups. Male rat pups exposed to DES during gestation (at concentrations similar to those
Types of action of environmental pollutants
Environmental pollutants exhibit several genomic and non-genomic actions. They bind to the nuclear receptors such as estrogen receptors α and β (ERα/ERβ), inducing transcription activation (or repression) of specific gene expression (Miyagawa et al., 2010, Couse and Korach, 2004). Non-genomic actions are mediated by a plasma membrane estrogen or androgen receptor. Xenoestrogens have both estrogenic and antiandrogenic actions and compete with natural androgens for the ligand-binding domain (LBD)
Limitations and questions
Although numerous studies point toward a major role for the environment in hypospadias, two limitations should be considered before attempting to draw definitive conclusions. First, caution should be exercised when extrapolating from murine experiments to humans. In these experiments, xenoestrogens induced hypospadias in male offspring exposed in utero, but the doses given to animals may not be comparable to environmental exposure. Second, several epidemiological studies have reported
Conclusion
The study of hypospadias is of interest for several reasons. It is an easily diagnosed malformation and, although minor, it recapitulates the pathophysiology of the disorders of sex development; the investigation of hypospadias thus offers insight into the mechanisms of sex determination and differentiation. Moreover, because hypospadias is at the crossroads of genetics and environment, it is a model for exploring genetic and environmental interactions (Fig. 1). The environmental data to date,
References (128)
- et al.
Estrogen receptor-alpha and beta are differentially distributed, expressed and activated in the fetal genital tubercle
J. Urol.
(2007) - et al.
Hypospadias: a familial study
J. Urol.
(1979) - et al.
Mutational study of the MAMLD1-gene in hypospadias
Eur. J. Med. Genet.
(2010) - et al.
Investigation of a mechanism for Leydig cell tumorigenesis by linuron in rats
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
(1993) - et al.
Estrogen receptor-alpha mediates the detrimental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure in the murine reproductive tract
Toxicology
(2004) - et al.
Xenoestrogen interaction with human sex hormone-binding globulin (hSHBG)
Steroids
(1999) - et al.
Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Pluripotential stem cells derived from migrating primordial germ cells
Differentiation
(2001) - et al.
Hypospadias rates in New York state are not increasing
J. Urol.
(2009) - et al.
Rising hypospadias rates: disproving a myth
J. Pediatr. Urol.
(2010)