Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gastroenterologists' Perceived Barriers to Optimal Pre-Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: Results of a National Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poor quality bowel preparation has been reported in almost one third of all colonoscopies. To better understand factors associated with poor bowel preparation, we explored perceived patient barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation from the perspective of the gastroenterologist. A random sample of physician members of the American College of Gastroenterology was surveyed via the internet and postal mailing. Demographic and practice characteristics and practice-related and perceived patient barriers to optimal bowel preparation were assessed among 288 respondents. Lack of time, no patient education reimbursement, and volume of information were not associated with physician level of suboptimal bowel preparation. Those reporting ≥10 % suboptimal bowel preparations were more likely to believe patients lack understanding of the importance of following instructions, have problems with diet, and experience trouble tolerating the purgative. Bowel preparation instruction communication and unmet patient educational needs contribute to suboptimal bowel preparation. Educational interventions should address both practice and patient-related factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer facts & figures 2011. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. CDC (2011) Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR 60:884–889

    Google Scholar 

  3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 130:1872–1885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, Denberg TD (2008) Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:438–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI (2011) The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1207–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL (2002) Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1696–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B (2007) The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102:2680–2685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke Hillyer G, Basch CH, Lebwohl B, Insel BJ, Basch CE, Neugut AI (2012) Surveillance practices following suboptimal bowel preparation in the United States; results of a national survey, in press

  9. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D (2007) Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25:373–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N (2001) Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1797–1802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, Thomas C, McCullough AJ (2006) Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2726–2730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ et al (2009) Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 69:700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH et al (2006) A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Gastrointest Endosc 63:894–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freudenberg N (1978) Shaping the future of health education: from behavior change to social change. Health Educ Monogr 6:372–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trindade AJ, Morisky DE, Ehrlich AC, Tinsley A, Ullman TA (2011) Current practice and perception of screening for medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasan SK, Coukos JA, Farraye FA (2011) Vaccinating the inflammatory bowel disease patient: deficiencies in gastroenterologists knowledge. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:2536–2540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richards CA, Kerker BD, Thorpe L et al (2011) Increased screening colonoscopy rates and reduced racial disparities in the New York Citywide campaign: an urban model. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1880–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones RM, Devers KJ, Kuzel AJ, Woolf SH (2010) Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 38:508–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD et al (2010) The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 38:499–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko CW, Riffle S, Shapiro JA et al (2007) Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:648–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abuksis G, Mor M, Segal N et al (2001) A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1786–1790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaikh AA, Hussain SM, Rahn S, Desilets DJ (2010) Effect of an educational pamphlet on colon cancer screening: a randomized, prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:444–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P et al (2011) Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 106:875–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK, Jacobson BC (2011) An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 73:307–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Modi C, Depasquale JR, Digiacomo WS et al (2009) Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopies. Qual Prim Care 17:397–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health fellowship (R25 CA094601) to C.H. Basch; a National Center for Research Resources at the National Institutes of Health grant (KL2 RR024157) to B. Lebwohl; American Cancer Society (RSGT-09-012-01-CPPB) grant to C.E. Basch; and National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (K07 151769) grant to F. Kastrinos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace Clarke Hillyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillyer, G.C., Basch, C.H., Basch, C.E. et al. Gastroenterologists' Perceived Barriers to Optimal Pre-Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: Results of a National Survey. J Canc Educ 27, 526–532 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0364-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0364-x

Keywords

Navigation