Skip to main content
Log in

Deep Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Looking Beyond Symptoms

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (S Hanauer, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic and disabling conditions. Accumulating evidence indicates that we need to look beyond clinical symptoms as current therapeutic strategies have not modified the course of IBD. Therapeutic goals for IBD have evolved from a mere control of symptoms to mucosal healing (MH). Achieving deep remission (clinical remission, biomarker remission and MH) might be the only way to alter disease course in IBD patients. In Crohn’s disease (CD), deep remission has been recently defined as Crohn’s Disease Activity Index <150 and complete MH. In ulcerative colitis (UC), there is no proposed definition of deep remission. It could be defined as clinical and endoscopic remission in UC. These definitions remain to be validated in large prospective studies. In the near future, the concept of deep remission might include transmural healing in CD and histologic healing in UC. Advances in drug development have provided highly effective treatments for IBD, making deep remission a realistic goal. Whether IBD patients may benefit by experiencing a ‘deep’ remission beyond the control of clinical symptoms, which might ultimately impact on important outcomes such as the need for surgery and the development of disability, needs to be evaluated in future disease modification trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been hihlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bouguen G, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Surgery for adult Crohn’s disease: what is the actual risk? Gut. 2011;60:1178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Filippi J, Allen PB, Hebuterne X, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Does anti-TNF therapy reduce the requirement for surgery in ulcerative colitis? A systematic review. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:1440–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Ferrante M, Magro F, et al. Results from the 2nd scientific workshop of the ECCO. I: impact of mucosal healing on the course of inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:477–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mader R, Keystone E. Optimizing treatment with biologics. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2007;80:16–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombel JRP, Sandborn WJ, Camez A, et al. Deep remission for adalimumab-treated patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: results from EXTEND. Abstract OP31, 5th Congress of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation, Prague, Czech Republic. February 25 27, 2010.

  6. Colombel JF, Rutgeerts P, Reinisch W, et al. Early mucosal healing with infliximab is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1194–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Meucci G, Fasoli R, Saibeni S, et al. Prognostic significance of endoscopic remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with oral and topical mesalazine: a prospective, multicenter study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1006–10. This prospective, multicenter study showed that persistence of endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis is a very strong predictor of early relapse. Endoscopic remission was defined as normal-appearing mucosa or only mild redness and/or friability, without either ulcers or erosions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern Jr F. Development of a Crohn’s disease activity index. National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:439–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey RF, Bradshaw MJ. Measuring Crohn’s disease activity. Lancet. 1980;1:1134–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daperno M, Castiglione F, de Ridder L, Dotan I, Farkkila M, Florholmen J, et al. Results of the 2nd part scientific workshop of the ECCO. II: measures and markers of prediction to achieve, detect, and monitor intestinal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:484–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Louis E, Mary JY, Vernier-Massouille G, et al. Maintenance of remission among patients with Crohn’s disease on antimetabolite therapy after infliximab therapy is stopped. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:63–70. e5; quiz e31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schreiber S, Keshavarzian A, Isaacs KL, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of tetomilast in active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:76–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mary JY, Modigliani R. Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn’s disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d’Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Gut. 1989;30:983–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hebuterne X, Lemann M, Bouhnik Y, et al. Endoscopic improvement of mucosal lesions in patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic Crohn’s disease following treatment with certolizumab pegol. Gut 2012.

  15. Modigliani R, Mary JY, Simon JF, et al. Clinical, biological, and endoscopic picture of attacks of Crohn’s disease. Evolution on prednisolone. Groupe d’Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:811–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daperno M, D’Haens G, Van Assche G, et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn’s disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:505–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanai H, Takeuchi K, Iida T, et al. Relationship between fecal calprotectin, intestinal inflammation, and peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:1438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sipponen T, Savilahti E, Karkkainen P, et al. Fecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and endoscopic disease activity in monitoring anti-TNF-alpha therapy for Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1392–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Molander P, Af Bjorkesten CG, Mustonen H, et al. Fecal calprotectin concentration predicts outcome in inflammatory bowel disease after induction therapy with TNFalpha blocking agents. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:2011–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Haens G, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, et al. Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;12:2218–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiorino G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Bowel damage assessment in Crohn's disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Drug Targets;13:1300–7.

  22. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009;58:1113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1759–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J. 1955;2:1041–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rachmilewitz D. Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1989;298:82–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutgeerts P. Comparative efficacy of coated, oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (Claversal) and sulphasalazine for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis. International Study Group. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1989;3:183–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lichtiger S, Present DH. Preliminary report: cyclosporin in treatment of severe active ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 1990;336:16–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Targan SR, BAS, Mayer L, Hommes D, et al. A phase I-II study: multiple dose levels of visilizumab are well tolerated and produce rapid and sustained improvement in ulcerative colitis patients refractory to treatment with IV steroids (IVSR-UC). Gastroenterology 2005;128 (Suppl2).

  29. Henriksen M, Jahnsen J, Lygren I, et al. C-reactive protein: a predictive factor and marker of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Results from a prospective population-based study. Gut. 2008;57:1518–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Solem CA, Loftus Jr EV, Tremaine WJ, et al. Correlation of C-reactive protein with clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and radiographic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A, et al. Ulcerative colitis: correlation of the Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index with fecal calprotectin, clinical activity, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1851–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schroeder KW, Tremaine WJ, Ilstrup DM. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1625–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Kornbluth A, et al. Delayed-release oral mesalamine at 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis: the ASCEND II trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Travis SP, Schnell D, Krzeski P, et al. Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). Gut. 2012;61:535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ordas I, Rimola J, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of disease activity and severity in ulcerative colitis: a prospective study. Gut 2012.

  36. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Gonzalez F, Dubuquoy L, et al. Mesenteric fat as a source of C reactive protein and as a target for bacterial translocation in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2012;61:78–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kiss LS, Szamosi T, Molnar T, et al. Early clinical remission and normalisation of CRP are the strongest predictors of efficacy, mucosal healing and dose escalation during the first year of adalimumab therapy in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:911–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fefferman DS, Farrell RJ. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: indications, surveillance, and use in clinical practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:11–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy endpoints for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:512–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:402–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1383–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. D’Haens G, Van Deventer S, Van Hogezand R, et al. Endoscopic and histological healing with Infliximab anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies in Crohn’s disease: a European multicenter trial. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1029–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. •• Rutgeerts P, Van Assche G, Sandborn WJ, et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains mucosal healing in patients with Crohn’s disease: data from the EXTEND trial. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1102–11. e2. This study proposed for the first time a definition of deep remission defined as CDAI <150 and complete MH (absence of mucosal ulcerations).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. D’Haens G NM, Baert F, Hiele M. Endoscopic healing after infliximab treatment for Crohn’s disease provides a longer time to relapse. Gastroenterology 2002;122.

  45. Rutgeerts P, Diamond RH, Bala M, et al. Scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab is superior to episodic treatment for the healing of mucosal ulceration associated with Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:433–42. quiz 464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baert F, Moortgat L, Van Assche G, et al. Mucosal healing predicts sustained clinical remission in patients with early-stage Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:463–8. quiz e10-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Froslie KF, Jahnsen J, Moum BA, Vatn MH. Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a Norwegian population-based cohort. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:412–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M, et al. Mucosal healing predicts long-term outcome of maintenance therapy with infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1295–301. This trial evaluated healing as a predictor of better outcome in Crohn’s disease. Complete but also partial healing induced by long-term maintenance treatment was associated with a lower need for major abdominal surgeries.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Baars JE, Nuij VJ, Oldenburg B, et al. Majority of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission have mucosal inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J, et al. Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thia KT, Sandborn WJ, Harmsen WS, et al. Risk factors associated with progression to intestinal complications of Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1147–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pariente B, Cosnes J, Danese S, et al. Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lemann score. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1415–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pariente B, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Cohen L, et al. Gastroenterology review and perspective: the role of cross-sectional imaging in evaluating bowel damage in Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2462–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:763–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pineton de Chambrun G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Lemann M, Colombel JF. Clinical implications of mucosal healing for the management of IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:15–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Riley SA, Mani V, Goodman MJ, et al. Microscopic activity in ulcerative colitis: what does it mean? Gut. 1991;32:174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bitton A, Peppercorn MA, Antonioli DA, et al. Clinical, biological, and histologic parameters as predictors of relapse in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:13–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Panaccione R, Hibi T, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Schreiber S. Implementing changes in clinical practice to improve the management of Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6 Suppl 2:S235–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hommes D, Colombel JF, Emery P, et al. Changing Crohn’s disease management: need for new goals and indices to prevent disability and improve quality of life. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6 Suppl 2:S224–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Hommes DW, et al. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2011;60:780–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Reinisch W, et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:257–65. e1-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zallot, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Deep Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Looking Beyond Symptoms. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 15, 315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-013-0315-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-013-0315-7

Keywords

Navigation