Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Liver haemangioma: common and uncommon findings and how to improve the differential diagnosis

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Haemangiomas are common focal liver lesions, generally detected in the work-up of asymptomatic patients. From the pathological point of view, they can be classified as small (capillary) or large, with cavernous vascular spaces that may show thrombosis, calcifications and hyalinisation. The polymorphic imaging appearance of haemangiomas depends on their histological features and flow pattern. The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has allowed an increased detection rate and a better characterisation of this benign tumour. Recent developments of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) providing high spatial and temporal resolution, together with the use of new contrast agents and/or pulse sequences has broadened the spectrum of imaging findings, contributing to diagnostic refinement in difficult cases. The scope of the present article is to provide an overview of the range of appearances of haemangiomas, explored with recent cross-sectional imaging modalities, emphasising its atypical findings as explored by temporally resolved contrast-enhanced imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Techert J, Seitz J, Feuerbach S (2001) Frequency of benign hepatic lesions incidentally detected with contrast-enhanced thin-section portal venous phase spiral CT. Acta Radiol 42(2):172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleuzen A, Tranquart F (2004) Incidental liver lesions: diagnostic value of cadence contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) and SonoVue. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):P53–P62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210(1):71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235(3):872–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs JF, Litwin AM, Kahlenberg MS (2004) Contemporary management of benign liver tumors. Surg Clin North Am 84(2):463–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S (2003) Imaging of benign focal liver lesions. In: Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S (eds) MRI of the liver, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, Milan, Italy, pp 105–170

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20(2):379–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony PP (1987) Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the liver and biliary tract, 2nd edn. In: MacSween RNM, Anthony PP, Scheuer PJ (eds) Pathology of the liver. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mungovan JA, Cronan JJ, Vacarro J (1994) Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: lack of enlargement over time. Radiology 191(1):111–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tung GA, Vaccaro JP, Cronan JJ, Rogg JM (1994) Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with high-field MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(2):1113–1117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey CJ, Albrecht T (2001) Ultrasound of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 11(9):1578–1593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang H, Kim TK, Lim HK, Park SJ, Sim JS, Kim HY, Lee JH (2003) Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(1):135–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim S, Chung JJ, Kim MJ, Park SJ, Lee JT, Yoo HS (2000) Atypical inside-out pattern of hepatic hemangiomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1571–1574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett GL, Petersein A, Mayo-Smith WW, Hahn PF, Schima W, Saini S (2000) Addition of gadolinium chelates to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging: limited role in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(2):477–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McFarland EG, Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, Hahn PF, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2-weighted conventional spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 193(1):43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cieszanowski A, Szeszkowski W, Golebiowski M, Bielecki DK, Grodzicki M, Pruszynski B (2002) Discrimination of benign from malignant hepatic lesions based on their T2-relaxation times calculated from moderately T2-weighted turbo SE sequence. Eur Radiol 12(9):2273–2279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan YL, Lee SF, Yu SC, Lai P, Ching AS (2002) Hepatic malignant tumour versus cavernous haemangioma: differentiation on multiple breath-hold turbo spin-echo MRI sequences with different T2-weighting and T2-relaxation time measurements on a single slice multi-echo sequence. Clin Radiol 57(4):250–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fenlon HM, Tello R, deCarvalho VL, Yucel EK (2000) Signal characteristics of focal liver lesions on double echo T2-weighted conventional spin echo MRI: observer performance versus quantitative measurements of T2 relaxation times. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(2):204–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohkawa M, Katoh T, Nakano S, Fujiwara N, Mori Y, Hino I, Tanabe M (1997) Use of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences for differential diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas and hepatic cysts. Acta Med Okayama 51(5):275–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herborn CU, Vogt F, Lauenstein TC, Goyen M, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG (2003) MRI of the liver: can True FISP replace HASTE? J Magn Reson Imaging 17(2):190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y (2003) Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 226(1):71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montet X, Lazeyras F, Howarth N, Mentha G, Rubbia-Brandt L, Becker CD, Vallee JP, Terrier F (2004) Specificity of SPIO particles for characterization of liver hemangiomas using MRI. Abdom Imaging 29(1):60–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng WW, Zhou KR, Chen ZW, Shen JZ, Chen CZ, Zhang SJ (2002) Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with SPIO-enhanced MRI. World J Gastroenterol 8(1):82–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Galia M, Cademartiri F, Lagalla R (2005) Liver haemangiomas undetermined at grey-scale ultrasound: contrast-enhancement patterns with SonoVue and pulse-inversion US. Eur Radiol 15(4):685–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lencioni R (2006) Impact of European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines on the use of contrast agents in liver ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16(7):1610–1613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Galia M, Cademartiri F, Lagalla R, Cardinale AE (2005) Benign focal liver lesions: spectrum of findings in SonoVue-enhanced pulse-inversion ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 15(8):1643–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Colakoglu O, Taskiran B, Yazici N, Buyrac Z, Unsal B (2005) Safety of biopsy in liver hemangiomas. Turk J Gastroenterol 16(4):220–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang DM, Kim HS, Cho SW, Kim HS (2002) Pictorial review: various causes of hepatic capsular retraction: CT and MR findings. Br J Radiol 75(900):994–1002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee SH, Park CM, Cheong IJ, Kwak MS, Cha SH, Choi SY, Kim CH (2001) Hepatic capsular retraction: unusual finding of cavernous hemangioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(2):231–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bader TR, Braga L, Semelka RC (2001) Exophytic benign tumors of the liver: appearance on MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 19(5):623–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lapeyre M, Mathieu D, Tailboux L, Rahmouni A, Kobeiter H (2002) Dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts associated with benign liver lesions: an unusual finding. Eur Radiol 12(1):71–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghai S, Dill-Macky M, Wilson S, Haider M (2005) Fluid–fluid levels in cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: baffled? AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(3 Suppl):S82–S85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Rymer R (1998) Fluid–fluid levels within focal hepatic lesions: imaging appearance and etiology. Abdom Imaging 23(2):161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Obata S, Matsunaga N, Hayashi K, Ohtsubo M, Morikawa T, Takahara O (1998) Fluid–fluid levels in giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver: CT and MRI demonstration. Abdom Imaging 23(6):600–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim KW, Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Choi BI (2001) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: findings at two-phase CT. Radiology 219(3):707–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW (2000) Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: temporal peritumoral enhancement during multiphase dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 216(3):692–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu JS, Kim KW, Park MS, Yoon SW (2002) Transient peritumoral enhancement during dynamic MRI of the liver: cavernous hemangioma versus hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(3):411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Giovagnoni A, Terilli F, Ercolani P, Paci E, Piga A (1994) MR imaging of hepatic masses: diagnostic significance of wedge-shaped areas of increased signal intensity surrounding the lesion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(5):1093–1097

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Aibe H, Hondo H, Kuroiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, Shinozaki K, Asayama Y, Taguchi K, Masuda K (2001) Sclerosed hemangioma of the liver. Abdom Imaging 26(5):496–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Blachar A, Grazioli L (2001) Hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis and natural history. Radiology 219(1):69–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP (1999) Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis. II. Focal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(5):1185–1192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mastropasqua M, Kanematsu M, Leonardou P, Braga L, Woosley JT, Semelka RC (2004) Cavernous hemangiomas in patients with chronic liver disease: MR imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 22(1):15–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mathieu D, Zafrani ES, Anglade MC, Dhumeaux D (1989) Association of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic hemangioma. Gastroenterology 97(1):154–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vilgrain V, Uzan F, Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Zappa M, Menu Y (2003) Prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia: MR imaging analysis. Radiology 229(1):75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clínica Universitária de Imagiologia, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal

    Filipe Caseiro-Alves, Jorge Brito, Pedro Belo-Soares & Henrique Rodrigues

  2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Rio de Janeiro 2and Labs-D’Or Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Antonio Eiras Araujo & Daniel Sousa

  3. Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal

    Augusta Cipriano

  4. Centre de Radiologie, 1, Boulevard de la Republique, 13100, Aix en Provence, France

    Didier Mathieu

Authors
  1. Filipe Caseiro-Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge Brito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Eiras Araujo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pedro Belo-Soares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Henrique Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Augusta Cipriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Didier Mathieu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe Caseiro-Alves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caseiro-Alves, F., Brito, J., Araujo, A.E. et al. Liver haemangioma: common and uncommon findings and how to improve the differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 17, 1544–1554 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0503-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0503-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation