Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: differentiation with triple-phase helical CT

  • Invited Feature Section
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma often show similar clinical and imaging appearances. This study aims to differentiate chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma by defining enhancement patterns in both pathologic conditions during triple-phase helical CT.

Methods

The study included 42 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 85 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CT images obtained according to protocol A (scan delays, 30, 60, and 150 s; 300 mg I/mL contrast material) or protocol B (scan delays, 40, 70, and 150 s; 370 mg I/mL contrast material) were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Mean contrast enhancement value of normal pancreas peaked in the first phase (early-washout pattern) while that of chronic pancreatitis peaked in the second phase (delayed-washout pattern), and that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma gradually rose (increasing pattern) in both protocols. Diagnostic indices for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were 82.4% and 94.1% for sensitivity, 83% and 83% for specificity, 82.7% and 90.4% for accuracy in protocols A and B, respectively, when differentiation between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma was performed based on time-attenuation curve patterns.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that time attenuation curves obtained from triple-phase helical CT in protocol B provide useful information in differentiating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chijiwa K, Saiki S, et al. (1996) “Mass-forming” pancreatitis masquerades as pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Pancreatol 20:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steer ML, Waxman I, Freedman S (1995) Chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 332:1482–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bramhall SR, Allum WH, Jones AG, et al. (1995) Treatment and survival in 13, 560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: an epidemiological study. Br J Surg 82:111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith CD, Behrns KE, van Heerden JA, et al. (1994) Radical pancreatoduodenectomy for misdiagnosed pancreatic mass. Br J Surg 81:585–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Tsutsumi R, Kim T, et al. (2007) Pancreatic carcinoma coexisting with chronic pancreatitis versus tumor-forming pancreatitis: diagnostic utility of the time-signal intensity curve from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. World J Gastroenterol 13:858–865

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JK, Altun E, Elias J, et al. (2007) Focal pancreatic mass: distinction of pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis using gadolinium-enhanced 3D-gradient-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:313–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ichikawa T, Sou H, Araki T, et al. (2001) Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas. Radiology 221:107–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu DSK, Vedantham S, Krasney RM, et al. (1996) Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic and hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas and vascular structures. Radiology 199:697–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrel MA, et al. (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229:81–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeman RK, Silverman PM, Ascher SM, et al. (1995) Helical (spiral) CT of the pancreas and biliary tract. Radiol Clin North Am 33:887–902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng AL, et al. (1999) Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 210:97–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlieman MG, Ho HS, Bold RJ (2003) Utility of tumor markers in determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 138:951–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida K, Toki F, Takeuchi T, et al. (1995) Chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune abnormality. Proposal of the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 40:1561–1568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okazaki K, Uchida K, Ohara M, et al. (2000) Autoimmune-related pancreatitis is associated with autoantibodies and a Th1/Th2-type cellular immune response. Gastroenterology 118:573–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang DH, Kim KW, Kim TK, et al. (2006) Autoimmune pancreatitis: radiologic findings in 20 patients. Abdom Imaging 31:94–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197:381–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Diehl S, Lehmann K, Sadick M, et al. (1998) Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing respectability. Radiology 206:373–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabuchi T, Itoh K, Ohshio G, et al. (1999) Tumor staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using early and late-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:375–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. (2004) MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:419–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim T, Murakami T, Takamura M, et al. (2001) Pancreatic mass due to chronic pancreatitis: correlation of CT and MR imaging features with pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:367–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, et al. (1996) Late contrast-enhanced CT for small pancreatic carcinoma: delayed enhanced area on CT with histopathological correlation. Hepatogastroenterology 43:1230–1237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Demachi H, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, et al. (1997) Histological influence on contrast-enhanced CT of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:980–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, et al. (1998) Effect of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:429–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Awai K, Hori S (2003) Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:2155–2160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Itoh S, Satake H, Ohta T, et al. (2002) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma showing iso-attenuation in early-phase contrast-enhanced CT: comparison with histopathological findings. Radiat Med 20:59–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boland GW, O’Malley ME, Saez M, et al. (1999) Pancreatic-phase versus portal vein-phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:605–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. (2001) Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 220:97–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tajima Y, Matsuzaki S, Furui J, et al. (2004) Use of the time-signal intensity curve from dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate remnant pancreatic fibrosis after pancreaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 91:595–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cubilla AL, Fitzgerald PJ (1984) Tumors of the exocrine pancreas. In: Atlas of tumor pathology. 2nd ed, vol 19, Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, pp 1–40

  30. Kuniyasu H, Abburuzzese JL, Cleary KR, et al. (2001) Induction of ductal and stromal hyperplasia by basic fibroblast growth factor produced by human pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Oncol 19:681–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Angelis C, Valente G, Spaccapietra M, et al. (1992) Histological study of alcoholic, nonalcoholic, and obstructive chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 7:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schilling MK, Redaelli C, Reber PU, et al. (1999) Microcirculation in chronic pancreatitis: a laser Doppler flow study. Pancreas 19:21–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis MP, Lo SK, Reber PU, et al. (2000) Endoscopic measurement of pancreatic tissue perfusion in patients with chronic pancreatitis and control patients. Gastrointest Endosc 51:195–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsuda T, Mochizuki T, Kikuchi K, et al. (2001) Late-phase enhancement of the upstream portion of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on dual-phase helical CT. Abdom Imaging 26:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromu Mori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamada, Y., Mori, H., Matsumoto, S. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: differentiation with triple-phase helical CT. Abdom Imaging 35, 163–171 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9579-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9579-7

Keywords

Navigation