Table 1

Summary of the four analysed studies

Study (year)Neri et al 14 Sakuramoto et al 15 Fujimoto et al 16 Douglass et al 17
Number of included patients (intervention vs control)69 vs 68529 vs 530129 vs 12071 vs 71
Inclusion criteriaResected, node-positive gastric cancer, no distant metastasesR0 resected, node positive (D2 or more extensive lymph node dissection), no distant metastases, no neoadjuvant CTxResected gastric cancer, no neoadjuvant and intraoperative CTxResected stomach cancer or cancer at the gastro-oesophageal junction, complete recovery from surgery, ingestion of a solid diet, maintenance of weight and absence of infection, no distant metastasis (directed extension of the neoplasm was accepted)
Intervention groupPostsurgical CTx with epidoxorubicin, leucovorin and 5-FUPostsurgical CTx with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidinePostsurgical CTx with 5-FU and FT-207, a derivate of 5-FUPostsurgical CTx using 5-FU and methyl-CCNU
Control groupNo treatmentNo treatmentNo treatmentNo treatment
Outcome (intervention vs control)Median survival time (31 months (range 7 to 60+) vs 18 months (range 2 to 60+), p<0.01)HR for death 0.68 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.87, p=0.003). 3-year overall survival rate 80.1% (95% CI 76.1 to 84.0) vs 70.1% (95% CI 65.5 to 74.6)Higher survival rates for intervention (χ2 at 24 and 36 months, p<0.05 and p<0.1, respectively)29 deaths vs 40 deaths. Log-rank testing of the two survival patterns revealed a p value of 0.06. Covariate analysis increased the value of this test to a level of significance, p<0.03. 50th percentile at 56 months vs median survival at 33 months
Weight assigned in the Cochrane review (%)3.84.42.62.9
  • 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CTx, chemotherapy.