Table 3

Final statements with levels of agreement

Final statementsLevel of agreement (%)
1In patients who are compliant to both rectal and oral therapy over an 8-week period, mesalazine-refractory proctitis is still an existing clinical problem.WG: 0.78
M: 0.82
N: 0.9
P: 0.53
2Present patient reported outcomes do not capture the symptom burden appropriately in proctitis. Disability, faecal incontinence, urgency, constipation and health-related quality of life are not captured.WG: 0.83
M: 0.8
N: 0.9
P: 0.83
3Constipation is a common problem in symptomatic refractory proctitis, and efforts should be made to treat it independently of inflammatory disease.WG: 0.76
M: 0.8
N: 0.65
P: 0.75
4A multidisciplinary team approach should be highly considered and at the appropriate time, a surgical option should also be considered in refractory inflammatory disease, though the type of surgical intervention is as yet unclear.WG: 0.79
M: 0.84
N: 0.83
P: 0.6
5Patient age and comorbidities should be factored into the decision-making process for therapies in refractory proctitis.WG: 0.84
M: 0.91
N: 0.75
P: 0.7
6Drug costs should not play a major role in the decision-making process regarding therapies for refractory proctitis.WG: 0.79
M: 0.76
N: 0.93
P: 0.73
7In the treatment of refractory inflammatory disease, patients prefer oral or systemic therapies rather than topical therapy.WG:0.7
M: 0.66
N: 0.8
P: 0.78
8Research investigating the role of thiopurines to treat inflammatory disease in mesalazine-refractory proctitis is limited.WG: 0.73
M: 0.74
N: 0.9
P: 0.57
9Low-dose topical or oral steroid therapy (5 mg prednisolone tablets or suppositories, or budesonide) may be considered to treat symptoms from inflammatory disease in select situations.WG: 0.84
M: 0.9
N: 0.83
P: 0.83
10Present evidence does not provide any clarity regarding the use and sequencing of biological agents and small molecules to treat inflammatory disease from refractory proctitis.WG: 0.77
M: 0.81
N: 0.78
P: 0.63
11Combination treatment with immunomodulators and any biological agents should be considered to treat refractory inflammatory disease in proctitis.WG: 0.8
M: 0.83
N: 0.95
P: 0.55
12After excluding other differential diagnoses, inflammatory disease may be treated with second-line or third-line biological treatments and small molecules.WG: 0.83
M: 0.87
N: 1.0
P: 0.6
13The role of off-licence topical therapies such as acetarsol or tacrolimus is unclear in the treatment of active inflammatory disease. More research is needed.WG: 0.8
M: 0.84
N: 0.83
P: 0.65
14Further research should be focused on refractory proctitis.WG: 0.92
M: 0.94
N: 1.0
P: 0.75
  • M, medical professionals; N, nurse practitioners; P, patients; WG, whole group.