Table 3

Model comparison using ROC curves

Model	FL vs non-FL			FLG-II vs FLG-I and FLG-0
Model	AUC	95% CI	P value	AUC	95% CI	P value
Bedogni et al9	0.718	0.67 to 0.77	<0.0001	0.821	0.77 to 0.87	<0.0001
Full model	0.731	0.68 to 0.78	<0.0001	0.843	0.79 to 0.89	<0.0001
Non-invasive	0.731	0.68 to 0.78	<0.0001	0.815	0.76 to 0.87	<0.0001
Without liver enzymes	0.703	0.65 to 0.76	<0.0001	0.809	0.75 to 0.87	<0.0001
Low cost	0.720	0.67 to 0.77	<0.0001	0.817	0.76 to 0.87	<0.0001
With liver enzymes	0.735	0.68 to 0.79	<0.0001	0.842	0.79 to 0.89	<0.0001
With lipid profile	0.702	0.65 to 0.76	<0.0001	0.808	0.75 to 0.86	<0.0001

AUC, area under the curve; FL, fatty liver; FLG, fatty liver grade; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.