Table 3

Comparisons between participants with and without insomnia symptoms and preliminary evidence of efficacy of CBT-I based on daily diary data and questionnaires

No insomnia (N=10)*
Mean (SE)
Pre-CBT-I (N=10)
Mean (SE)
Insomnia vs no insomnia
t test and effect size (95% CI)
Immediately post-CBT-I (N=10)†‡Insomnia pretreatment vs post-treatment T test and effect size (95% CI)1 month follow-up (N=8)§
Mean (SE)
Insomnia pretreatment vs follow-up T test and effect size (95% CI)
Primary CBT-I outcomes
Sleep-onset latency in minutes12.52 (2.80)47.40 (9.02)t(16)=3.34, p=0.004; 1.51 (.47 to 2.52)17.11 (3.93)t(9)=3.95, p=0.003; 1.25 (.39 to 2.07)23.03 (7.60)t(7)=2.33, p=0.05; .82 (−0.01 to 1.53)
Wake after sleep onset in minutes16.35 (5.19)36.41 (3.12)t(16)=3.46, p=0.003; 1.56 (.51 to 2.58)17.68 (4.75)t(9)=3.86, p=0.004; 1.17 (.36 to 1.95)21.14 (5.55)t(7)=2.92, p=0.02; .98 (.13 to 1.78)
Hours of sleep7.30 (.12)7.21 (.78)t(16)=-.09, p=0.93; −0.04 (−0.93-.89)7.52 (.22)t(9)=-.37, p=0.72; −0.11 (−0.70-.49)7.27 (.18)t(7)=-.71, p=0.50; −0.24 (−0.89-.44)
Sleep efficiency (%)89.62% (1.0)75.20% (4.76)t(16)=−2.66, p=0.017; 1.20 (.21 to 2.16)91.51% (1.34)t(9)=−3.77, p=0.004; 1.14 (.34 to 1.91)89.62% (2.23)t(7)=2.71, p=0.03; .90 (.08 to 1.69)
Insomnia Severity Index5.40 (.64)16.50 (1.68)t(18)=6.17, p<0.001; 2.64 (1.43 to 3.83)4.38 (.65)t(7)=8.79, p<0.001; 2.94 (1.29 to 4.57)4.86 (1.39)t(6)=6.97, p<0.001; 2.47 (.93 to 3.98)
Pittsburg sleep quality index5.40 (.58)10.90 (1.03)t(18)=4.66, p<0.001; 2.00 (.92 to 3.04)4.50 (1.10)t(7)=5.53, p=0.001; 1.85 (.68 to 2.98)4.43 (.84)t(6)=8.29, p<0.001; 2.93 (1.17 to 4.68)
Secondary CBT-I outcomes
Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep3.26 (.33)6.18 (.42)t(18)=5.52, p<0.001; 2.37 (1.21 to 3.48)3.24 (.33)t(7)=7.18, p<0.001; 2.40 (.99 to 3.78)3.11 (.59)t(6)=7.43, p<0.001; 2.63 (1.01 to 4.23)
Self-reported active disease (PRO-3)50%60%X2 (1, N=20)=0.20, p=0.650%McNeman’s Test p=0.0312.5%McNeman’s Test p=0.38
  • Bolded values are significant, though should be interpreted with caution given our small sample size.

  • *n=8 participants had complete diary data.

  • †The last week of CBT-I treatment data were used for each participant in data analyses.

  • ‡n=8 participants had questionnaire data.

  • §n=7 participants had questionnaire data.

  • CBT-I, cognitive–behavioural therapy for insomnia; PRO-3, patient-reported outcome-3.