Table 2

Distribution of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure-related parameters and risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis by group.

EI (n=275)WI (n=273)P value
Choledocholithiasis as an indication, n (%)208 (75.6)202 (73.9)0.657
Difficult cannulation (>5 min)82 (29.8)91 (33.3)0.376
Cannulation success rate, n (%)271 (98.5)269 (98.5)0.991
Trainee involvement, n (%)258 (93.8)267 (97.8)0.020
Number of cannulation attempts by trainee, (mean±SD)2.6±4.12.2±2.90.328
Time of cannulation attempts by trainee, min (mean±SD)2.8±3.52.9±4.70.631
Number of cannulation attempts by professor, (mean±SD)1.5±3.11.5±2.30.904
Time of cannulation attempts by professor, min (mean±SD)2.2±4.42.0±3.50.574
Common bile duct diameter, mm (mean±SD)9.1±7.48.9±6.70.668
Biliary sphincterotomy, n (%)224 (81.4)206 (75.4)0.087
Pancreatic sphincterotomy, n (%)9 (3.2)13 (4.7)0.374
Precut sphincterotomy, n (%)92 (33.4)105 (38.4)0.221
Pancreatic duct guidewire insertion, n (%)58 (21)71 (26)0.174
Pancreatography, n (%)13 (4.7)16 (5.8)0.553
Periampullary diverticulum, n (%)24 (8.7)24 (8.7)0.978
Choledocolithiasis, n (%)164 (59.6)160 (58.6)0.806
Balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi, n (%)38 (13.8)49 (17.9)0.185
Ampullectomy, n (%)2 (0.7)6 (2.1)0.280
Brushing of the pancreatic duct, n (%)1 (0.3)1 (0.3)0.481
Placement of a nasobiliary catheter, n (%)1 (0.3)0
Volume of contrast media, mL (mean±SD)20.8±13.520.4±12.40.697
Total length of the procedure, min (mean±SD)26.7±20.326.9±20.70.916
  • Student’s t-test and χ2 test were used.

  • EI, epinephrine and rectal indomethacin; WI, sterile water and rectal indomethacin.