Table 1

Prospective/retrospective studies on diagnostic performance of EUS versus CT for detection of pancreatic malignancy

StudyYear of studyTotal no of patientsSensitivity, EUS versus CT (%)Specificity, EUS versus CT (%)Accuracy, EUS versus CT (%)
Du et al1720176898 vs 73*NANA
Kamata et al18201435100 vs 56*100 vs 100NA
Kitano et al19201227791 vs 71*94 vs 92NA
Sakamoto et al20200815694 vs 50*NANA
Jemma et al21200842100 vs 88*89 vs 83NA
Kitano et al2220046595 vs 68*NANA
Agarwal et al23200481100 vs 75*NA94 vs 74*
DeWitt et al9200412098 vs 86*NANA
Rivadeneira et al24200348100 vs 68*75 vs 50*98 vs 67*
Mertz et al2520003593 vs 53*NA86 vs 49*
Gress et al261999151100 vs 74NANA
Harrison et al27199919100 vs 50*NA98 vs 63*
Midwinter et al2819994897 vs 76NANA
Legmann et al29199830100 vs 92NA93 vs 93
Sugiyama et al3019975496 vs 89*NANA
Howard et al3119972175 vs 63†77 vs 100†76 vs 86†
Melzer et al32199612100 vs 83NA100 vs 76
Nakaizumi et al33199523294 vs 65*97 vs 9496 vs 88*
Marty et al3419953792 vs 63NANA
Müller et al3519944994 vs 69†100 vs 6496 vs 67
Palazzo et al3719936496 vs 69†73 vs 5391 vs 66*
Yasuda et al38199329100 vs 72†NADuodenal Invasion: 83 vs 33
Gastric invasion: 79 vs 38
Rösch et al39199110299 vs 77100 vs 53NA
  • *Statistically significant data.

  • †Statistics are not available.

  • EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; NA, not applicable.