Factor | Study | ||||||||||||||||
Abdovic 201322 | Bel 201523 | Beld 201024 | Chouliaras 201730 | Dunker 199834 | Eshuis 200835 | Eshuis 2010 | Kjaer 2014 | Maunder 199954 | McDermott 201514 | Muller 201058 | Ogden 201160 | Perrin 200861 | Polle 200763 | Saha 201565 | Scarpa 200967 | Trin dade 201771 | |
Female gender | r=−0.18* | Diffe rence in means p=0.08 | Diffe rence in means p>0.10 | Diffe rence in scores p=0.18 | No signif icant asso ciation | Fem ales signif icantly worse scores* | p<0.001* | Diffe rence in propo rtions p=0.0007 | Signif icantly worse scores in open surgery group p=0.004* | p<0.0001* | |||||||
Higher disease/ symptom activity | r=0.38* | No significant association | r=0.5* | p<0.001* | p=0.50 | p=0.003* | In UC p=0.006* In CD p=0.003* | Multiple regression β=0.426 p=0.006* | Active disease r=0.18 Symptoms r=0.40* | ||||||||
Fatigue | r=0.55* | ||||||||||||||||
Disease subtype | No significant association | p=0.63 | Difference in proportions p=0.094 | p=0.05 | No association found | ||||||||||||
Age | r=−0.18* | No sign ificant asso ciation | Younger age p<0.001* | r=−0.06 | |||||||||||||
Steroids | No signif icant asso ciation | No signif icant associ ation | p=0.03* | p=0.05* | p=0.02* | r=0.22* | |||||||||||
Smoking | p=0.001* | ||||||||||||||||
Open/ conventional surgery | Difference in scores p=0.2 | Difference in means p=0.51 | Difference in median p=0.03* | Difference in median p=0.17 | No significant differences | Multiple regression (for laparoscopic approach) β=0.331 p=0.036* | |||||||||||
Increased BMI | Women only p<0.001* | No significant association | r=0.25* | ||||||||||||||
Impaired QoL | r=0.52* | r=0.67* | r<0.41 | r=0.5* | p<0.001* | r=0.51* | One-unit increase ASWAP score associated with a 0.62 decrease in BDQ (p<0.0001)* | Psychological QoL r=0.56* Physical QoL r=0.50* |
With some tools, higher scores indicate better body image/QoL and in others higher scores indicate worse body image/QoL. This may result in both positive and negative correlation coefficients. Where applicable, signs have been flipped for ease of interpretation to clearly show the positive correlation between body image and quality of life.
*Significant association found.
ASWAP, Adapted Satisfaction with Appearance Scale; BIDQ, Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire; BMI, body mass index; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; QoL, quality of life.