PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hassan Al-Balas
AU  - Zeyad Metwalli
AU  - Iftikhar Burney
AU  - David Sada
TI  - Primary placement of low-profile or ‘button’ versus traditional balloon-retention radiologically inserted gastrostomy catheters in adults: a retrospective review
AID  - 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001118
DP  - 2023 Mar 01
TA  - BMJ Open Gastroenterology
PG  - e001118
VI  - 10
IP  - 1
4099  - http://bmjopengastro.bmj.com//content/10/1/e001118.short
4100  - http://bmjopengastro.bmj.com//content/10/1/e001118.full
SO  - BMJ Open Gastro2023 Mar 01; 10
AB  - Objective De novo percutaneous placement of radiologically inserted low-profile or ‘button-type’ gastrostomy catheters (LPG) is infrequently reported in adults. This study compares the safety and clinical outcomes of primary percutaneous placement of LPG catheters and traditional balloon-retention gastrostomy catheters (TG) using image guidance at a single institution.Design This was a retrospective, single-institution review comparing initial LPG and TG radiologically inserted catheter placements in a 36-month time period. The age, gender, indication, catheter type and method of anaesthesia of 139 consecutive initial gastrostomy placement procedures were recorded. Total catheter days without intervention, major and minor complications, reasons for reintervention, and procedure fluoroscopy times were compared.Results During the 36-month study period, 61 LPG and 78 TG catheters were placed. Mean total catheter days prior to intervention was 137 days in the LPG group and 128 days in the TG group (p=0.70). Minor complications including cellulitis, pericatheter leakage and early catheter occlusion occurred in 4.9% (3/61) in the LPG group and 9% (7/78) in the TG group (p=0.5). Major complications including early catheter dislodgement and bleeding requiring transfusion (in one patient) occurred in 4.9% (3/61) in the LPG group and 7.7% (6/78) in the TG group (p=0.4). Procedure fluoroscopy time was lower in the LPG group (2.56 min) compared with the TG group (4.21 min) (p<0.005).Conclusion Primary placement of low-profile or ‘button-type’ gastrostomy catheters is technically feasible with a low complication rate similar to that of traditional radiologically inserted gastrostomy catheters.No data are available.