You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Review
Gastrointestinal lymphoma: the new mimic
  1. Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas1,
  2. Mary Schwartz2,
  3. Eamonn Quigley2
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2Hepatology and Nutrition, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas; ASThomas1{at}mdanderson.org

Abstract

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) lymphomas comprise a group of distinct clinicopathological entities of B- or T- cell type, with primary gastrointestinal Hodgkin lymphoma being extremely uncommon. The GI tract is the predominant site of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma accounting for 30–40% of all extranodal lymphomas. In the Western world, the stomach is the most commonly involved site followed by the small bowel. Several chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated disorders which predispose to accelerated cell turnover may lead to the malignant transformation of gut lymphocytes and ultimately manifest as GI lymphoma. The challenge for the clinical gastroenterologist is that these tumors may have varied presentations, ranging from nonspecific symptoms such as dyspepsia or bloating to abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, GI bleeding, diarrhea, weight loss or bowel obstruction.

Objective We illustrate the range of presentations of GI lymphoma with examples based on consecutive cases evaluated at our institution over a 6-month period. These cases demonstrate how appropriately directed endoscopic evaluation with biopsies has the potential to provide a definitive diagnosis and allow the patient to proceed to definitive therapy.

Conclusions The GI tract is the most commonly involved site for extranodal lymphoma with the stomach being most frequently involved organ.Chronic Helicobacter pylori infection, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune disorders may predispose to GI lymphoma. This heterogenous group of diseases has varied presentations that may mimic several other GI clinico-pathologic entities. GI lymphomas may be diagnosed with appropriately directed endoscopic evaluation coupled with generous tissue sampling and expert pathologic assessment. Management may range from antibiotic therapy, in the case of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric MALT lymphoma, to chemotherapy with or without radiation and, in rare instances, surgery. There are presently no guidelines to direct endoscopic surveillance of GI lymphomas following treatment.

  • gastric lymphoma
  • gastrointestinal neoplasia
  • gastrointestinal pathology

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000320

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    The gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal surface functions as a variably permeable barrier subserving its roles in secretion and absorption along the length of the gut. Its surface area is greatly increased through various anatomical and ultrastructural features (folds, villi and microvilli). This facilitates its access to the products of digestion as well as exposure to a significant antigenic load from microorganisms and ingested materials in the lumen. The mucus layer on the mucosal surface, together with the epithelium (gut barrier), serves as the first line of defence against pathogens and other potentially injurious invaders. More specific immunological responses are generated by the gut or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) in the epithelium and lamina propria. These lymphoid cells are produced in the bone marrow and thymus and migrate to the gut to form one of the largest collections of immune cells in the body.1 MALT, through its unique immunophysiological characteristics, serves to maintain immune homeostasis in the intestine. The most distinctive and visible aggregation of lymphoid tissue in the GI tract is found in the Peyer’s patches in the terminal ileum; the remainder is diffusely distributed in the form of lymphoid aggregates in the lamina propria throughout the entire GI tract.1 2 Repetitive inflammation and antigenic stimulation in response to autoimmune and inflammatory disorders can lead to monoclonal proliferation and the development of extranodal GI lymphomas over time. For example, chronic Helicobacter pylori infection in the gastric mucosa, typically devoid of MALT, may lead to lymphoid cell proliferation.3 Malignant transformation of this acquired gastric MALT results in an indolent MALT lymphoma which may be treated simply by eradication of the underlying chronic infection.4 Among those with a hereditary sensitivity to gluten, that is, coeliac disease, gluten peptides presented by HLADQ2 and HLADQ8-positive antigen presenting cells elicit an immune response leading to destruction of the intestinal epithelium by intraepithelial T-cell lymphocytes.5 Malignant transformation of these cells can lead to an aggressive enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) of the small bowel.6 Autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus have been associated with the development of GI lymphoma; immunosuppression, rather than the disease process itself, confers this risk in this patient population. Additionally, congenital syndrome as well as AIDS predisposes to the development of lymphomas.7 Thiopurines and anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies, such as those employed in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), also increase the risk of developing lymphoma.8–10 Young males under the age of 35 on thiopurine therapy for IBD seem to be especially at risk for the development of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma.11

    Epidemiology

    The WHO broadly classifies lymphoid neoplasms as precursor lymphoid neoplasms, mature B-cell neoplasms, mature T-cell and natural killer cell neoplasms, and Hodgkin’s lymphomas based on distinctive pathological and genetic features.12 Extranodal Hodgkin’s lymphoma is exceedingly rare. Extranodal GI B-cell lymphomas are more common (contributing 80% of the total) than T-cell lymphomas, are more responsive to chemotherapy and have a better overall prognosis.13 Most lymphomas demonstrate fairly typical architectural features and specific cytogenetic abnormalities which aid in pathological diagnosis.

    GI lymphomas constitute 1%–4% of all GI malignancies, 10%–15% of all non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL), and 30%–40% of all extranodal NHLs, making the GI tract the most common site for extranodal lymphoma.14 In terms of anatomical location the most common site is the stomach, followed by small bowel and colorectum; oesophageal lymphoma is exceptionally rare.15 16 In one large study of primary GI NHLs, the anatomical distribution was as follows: gastric—74.8%, small bowel—8.6% and ileocaecal—7.0%. Multiple locations were noted in 6.5%.17

    Typically, GI lymphomas present in the sixth decade of life and are slightly more common in males.18 The challenge for the clinical gastroenterologist is that these tumours may present in very varied ways, ranging from non-specific symptoms such as dyspepsia or bloating to abdominal pain, nausea, emesis, GI bleeding, diarrhoea, weight loss or bowel obstruction. Appropriately directed endoscopic evaluation with biopsies has the potential to provide a definitive diagnosis and allow the patient to proceed to definitive therapy. Routine histology, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, in situ hybridisation, and fluorescent in situ hybridisation can all be performed on biopsies to provide the detailed information needed for optimal therapy.

    Methods

    To exemplify the range of presentations of GI lymphoma and to illustrate the important role of the gastroenterologist in its assessment, we present a series of cases of GI lymphomas seen at our institution between January and June 2017 (table 1). We identified 16 individual cases that were diagnosed by various gastroenterologists during this time period. Illustrative clinical and endoscopic features are provided.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Demographics, presenting features and clinical findings in 16 consecutive cases of gastrointestinal lymphoma

    Illustrative clinical presentations

    Abdominal pain

    Approximately 45%–65% of all cases of GI lymphomas present clinically with abdominal pain due to a mass or bowel obstruction, as illustrated by the following three patients.15–18

    • A man presented with abdominal pain for several weeks and imaging findings of intussusception due to a caecal mass. Colonoscopy showed a partially obstructing mass at the ileocaecal valve (figure 1A). Biopsies demonstrated a high-grade B-cell lymphoma (figure 1B).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (A) Partially obstructing mass at ileocecal valve. (B) High grade B cell lymphoma

    • A man on therapy for H.pylori-associated chronic gastritis was evaluated for progressive severe right lower quadrant pain. CT of the abdomen showed focal thickening in the terminal ileum with associated mesenteric lymphadenopathy. Colonoscopic evaluation demonstrated a multilobulated ulcerated polypoid lesion at the ileocaecal valve (figure 2A) as well as a large fungating, polypoid, ulcerated, non-obstructing mass in the distal ileum (figure 2B). Biopsies of both lesions showed large B-cell lymphoma.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (A) Multilobulated ulcerated polypoid lesion at the ileocaecal valve. (B) A large fungating, polypoid, ulcerated, non-obstructing mass in the distal ileum

    • A woman with a history of anal cancer treated by chemoradiation and complicated by an anal stricture was hospitalised with progressive right lower abdominal pain. Abdominal imaging with CT revealed the presence of a caecal mass with adjacent lymphadenopathy (figure 3A). Colonoscopic evaluation demonstrated a malignant appearing partially obstructing tumour in the caecum (figure 3B) and biopsies showed Epstein-Barr virus-positive Burkitt lymphoma (figure 3C).

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (A) A caecal mass with adjacent lymphadenopathy on contrasted abdominal imaging. (B) Malignant appearing partially obstructing cecal tumor. (C) EBV positive Burkitt Lymphoma.

    Diarrhoea

    • A man with hemochromatosis complicated with portopulmonary hypertension and common variable immunodeficiency syndrome on intravenous immunoglobulin replacement and idiopathic thrombocytopenia on high-dose steroids was evaluated for chronic non-bloody diarrhoea and weight loss for 3 months.

    Colonoscopy showed several polyps in the transverse colon, hepatic flexure, ascending colon and caecum that were biopsied (figure 4A,B). Biopsies from the hepatic flexure polyp demonstrated marginal zone lymphoma with focal transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBL).

    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Benign appearing colon polyps.

    GI haemorrhage

    • A woman presented with massive haematemesis. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was remarkable for a large cratered necrotic duodenal ulcer (figure 5A, arrowed) and CT of the abdomen revealed marked thickening of the duodenal wall (figure 5B, arrowed). Biopsies demonstrated large B-cell lymphoma (figure 5C).

    Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (A) Large cratered necrotic duodenal ulcer. (B) Marked duodenal wall thickening on contrasted abdominal imaging. (C) Large B- cell lymphoma.

    • A man was admitted with overt melena and progressive symptomatic anaemia for a week; evaluation by upper endoscopy showed a large, fungating, infiltrative and ulcerated circumferential mass in the gastric fundus (also seen on imaging of the abdomen—figure 6A) in addition to congested, granular, nodular and ulcerated mucosa of the entire stomach (figure 6B); biopsies demonstrated DLBL (figure 6C).

    Figure 6
    Figure 6

    (A) Mass in the gastric fundus on contrasted abdominal imaging. (B) Large, fungating, infiltrative mass in fundus . (C) Diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

    Non-specific upper GI symptoms

    • A woman was evaluated with upper endoscopy (EGD) for dyspepsia. Findings included non-specific erythema and erosions in the stomach and duodenal bulb (figure 7A,B). Antral biopsies demonstrated low-grade B-cell lymphoma.

    Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Non specific gastric erosions and duodenal bulb erythema.

    • A man with a remote history of treated H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease was admitted with early satiety accompanied by nausea, emesis and significant weight loss. CT of the abdomen showed a large gastric mass with direct invasion into the left lobe of the liver suspicious for malignancy (figure 8A); an upper endoscopy showed a large fungating, infiltrative and ulcerated circumferential mass in the body of the stomach (figure 8B); biopsies demonstrated DLBL (H. pylori negative).

    Figure 8
    Figure 8

    (A) Large gastric mass with direct invasion into left lobe of liver on contrasted abdominal imaging. (B) Fungating, ulcerated mass in gastric body. (C) Diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

    Gastric ulceration

    • A man presented with a food impaction; EGD showed a non-obstructive Schatzki’s ring, erythematous gastric mucosa and multiple clean-based ulcers in the stomach and duodenum (figure 9A,B). Biopsies demonstrated H.pylori-associated chronic active gastritis and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosal associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) (figure 9C). He completed a course of treatment for H. pylori with complete resolution of the lymphoma on repeat endoscopic evaluation.

    Figure 9
    Figure 9

    (A, B) Clean based antral and duodenal bulb ulcers. (C) MALT lymphoma.

    Discussion

    Clinical features by anatomical location

    Oesophageal lymphoma

    Primary oesophageal lymphoma is very rare comprising less than 1% of all primary GI lymphomas. Oesophageal involvement is usually secondary to spread from cervical or mediastinal lymph nodes.19 Clinically, patients may present with dysphagia, weight loss, dyspepsia or upper GI bleeding. Endoscopically, these tumours may have a nodular, polypoidal, ulcerated or stenotic appearance. Endoscopic ultrasound may be employed to assess the depth of tumour invasion.20

    Gastric lymphoma

    The stomach is the most frequently involved GI site among GI lymphomas. MALT lymphoma is the most common subtype followed by DLBL.21 A small proportion of patients with H. pylori infection may develop MALT lymphoma. The bacterial infection may trigger activation of CD4 T cells and indirectly stimulate B cells and, thereby, lead to the development of a malignancy.22 Additionally, it has been noted that individuals with the t(11;18)(q21;q21) translocation appear to have a higher predisposition to develop MALT lymphoma.23 Clinically, these patients may report abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or present with upper GI bleeding.21 24 The endoscopic appearance of MALT lymphomas is variable ranging from an exophytic ulcerated mass to hypertrophic and enlarged gastric folds or hyperaemic changes in gastric mucosa,24 25 as illustrated by case 9.

    Though less common than MALT lymphoma, gastric DLBL has also been observed to be associated with H. pylori infection and reported to express CD19, CD20, CD22 and CD79.26 27 They may present with symptoms similar to MALT lymphoma. Endoscopically, they are often located in the gastric body/fundus and may appear as an ulcerated lesion or a polypoid mass or diffuse/focal thickening of the gastric wall (cases 5, 6, 8)26

    Intestinal lymphoma

    The small bowel and large bowel are the second most commonly affected sites, with the ileum most often involved. Various lymphoma subtypes found in the intestines include MALT, DLBL, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and intestinal T-cell lymphoma.14–18 28 29 Patients may present with fever, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, haematochezia and weight loss (cases 1, 3, 4). CT of the abdomen may display bowel wall thickening, obstruction or mucosal ulceration.14–18 28–30 Capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy are used to detect these tumours which may appear as ulcerated lesions or diffuse mucosal thickening with coarse or fine granular appearance.31 The latter is especially useful due to the predilection of lymphoma to the distal ileum and ileocaecal areas.31

    Lymphoma of gall bladder, biliary tree, pancreas and liver

    While our focus has been on lymphoma involving the oesophagus, stomach, small intestine and colon we should note that other components of the digestive system may also give rise to primary lymphomas. Primary lymphoma of the gall bladder, most commonly a MALT lymphoma or DLBL, is very rare and typically present as right upper quadrant pain.32–35 MALT lymphomas arising in the bile duct at the hilum have also been described as having extremely rare instances of B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and lymphoblastic lymphoma. Clinically, cholangiocarcinoma, primary sclerosing cholangitis or pancreatitis is the initial diagnosis with the true nature of the pathology being discovered at surgery.35 36 Primary pancreatic lymphomas account for less than 0.5% of all malignant pancreatic neoplasms and are usually diffuse B cell in morphology and most commonly present as a mass in the pancreatic head.37 While secondary involvement of the liver by lymphoma is common, primary hepatic lymphomas comprise 0.016% of all instances of NHL. Righty upper quadrant pain, fever and weight loss are common presenting symptoms, and hepatomegaly, rather than jaundice the main physical sign. Again B-cell morphology dominates.38

    Management

    Various strategies and modalities of treatment are employed in the management of GI lymphomas based on the area of involvement, histological type and clinical staging.12 39 40 For example, early-stage follicular lymphoma follows an indolent course and may be followed clinically with a ‘watch and wait’ policy.41 Indeed, a retrospective study by Young and colleagues noted a similar overall 7.5-year survival rate among those with follicular lymphoma that underwent watchful waiting or aggressive combined modality treatment.42

    More than 70% of patients with early-stage (Ann Arbor Classification Stages I–III) MALT lymphomas associated with H. pylori infection can achieve remission with triple or quadruple eradication therapy alone,4 43 44 with a tumour location, patient ethnicity, depth of invasion and molecular feature all influencing response rates.24 Radiation therapy and chemotherapy are reserved for advanced tumours and non-responders. Surgery should prove necessary only in instances of perforation or where haemorrhage cannot be controlled endoscopically.45 With regard to follow-up, it is recommended that endoscopy with careful inspection and biopsy of the previously affected area is recommended at six monthly intervals for the first 6 months and yearly thereafter.45 For non-H.pylori-associated MALT lymphomas, there is currently a lack of consensus on optimal initial therapeutic mode with both radiation therapy and chemotherapy being employed.46

    For DLBLs of the stomach and intestine the consensus is that chemotherapy incorporating rituximab-cyclophosphamide-oncovin-prednisolone should be the standard regimen.45 47–49 Here again, surgery is restricted to the management of complications such as perforation and haemorrhage.45 In the past, surgical resection was widely employed in the management of patients with GI lymphoma50; greater accuracy in preoperative diagnosis should minimise the need for surgical intervention nowadays, even in instances of intestinal obstruction, as illustrated by our case 1, where chemotherapy induced complete resolution of an obstructing tumour.

    The prognosis for intestinal T-cell lymphomas, in general, and for EATL type I (ie, that associated with coeliac disease) and monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma (formerly referred to as EATL type II), in particular, is poor and management strategies for these and other rare forms of GI lymphoma vary according to presentation, location, stage and histological type and may involve chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, surgery and autologous stem cell transplantation.51–53 In one study which included a variety of peripheral T-cell lymphomas the response rate to cyclophosphamide-oncovin-prednisolone at a median follow-up of 27 months was 62%.54

    One complication of chemotherapy that the gastroenterologist should be aware of is intestinal perforation. In one series of 1062 patients with histologically proven GI lymphoma 9% developed a perforation with just over one-half of these occurring after commencement of chemotherapy. The median time to perforation following initiation of chemotherapy was 46 days, most commonly involved the small intestine; aggressive B-cell histology was an important risk factor.55

    With the exception of the surveillance strategy outlined above for following patients with H.pylori-associated T-cell lymphoma there are no guidelines for the endoscopic surveillance of patients following successful treatment of other gastric, small intestinal or colonic lymphomas. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the follow-up of gastric lymphoma is yet to be defined.56 Nor are there guidelines for surveillance of at-risk individuals such as those with disorders associated with an increased risk for lymphoma, such as coeliac disease57 or nodular lymphoid hyperplasia.58 59

    References

    1. 1.↵
      1. Bienenstock J
      . Gut and bronchus associated lymphoid tissue: an overview. Adv Exp Med Biol1982;149:471–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. 2.↵
      1. Akirav EM,
      2. Alonso-Gonzalez N,
      3. Truman LA
      . Lymphoid Tissues and Organs. In: Paul WE, ed. Fundamental immunology. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2013: 47–66.
    3. 3.↵
      1. Nagai S,
      2. Mimuro H,
      3. Yamada T, et al
      . Role of Peyer's patches in the induction of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2007;104:8971–6.doi:10.1073/pnas.0609014104
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. 4.↵
      1. Wotherspoon AC,
      2. Diss TC,
      3. Pan L, et al
      . Regression of primary low-grade B-cell gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type after eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Lancet1993;342:575–7.doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91409-F
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. 5.↵
      1. Fasano A,
      2. Catassi C
      . Clinical practice. celiac disease. N Engl J Med2012;367:2419–26.doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1113994
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. 6.↵
      1. Cellier C,
      2. Delabesse E,
      3. Helmer C, et al
      . Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associate T-cell lymphoma. French coeliac disease Study Group. Lancet2000;356:203–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. 7.↵
      1. Sandler AS,
      2. Kaplan LD
      . Diagnosis and management of systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in HIV disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am1996;10:1111–24.doi:10.1016/S0889-8588(05)70387-7
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. 8.↵
      1. Kotlyar DS,
      2. Lewis JD,
      3. Beaugerie L, et al
      . Risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol2015;13:847–58.doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.015
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. 9.↵
      1. Kotlyar DS,
      2. Osterman MT,
      3. Diamond RH, et al
      . A systematic review of factors that contribute to hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol2011;9:36–41.doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.016
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. 10.↵
      1. Hanauer SB,
      2. Feagan BG,
      3. Lichtenstein GR, et al
      . Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the accent I randomised trial. Lancet2002;359:1541–9.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08512-4
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. 11.↵
      1. Colombel J-F,
      2. Loftus EV,
      3. Tremaine WJ, et al
      . The safety profile of infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease: the Mayo clinic experience in 500 patients. Gastroenterology2004;126:19–31.doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.047
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. 12.↵
      1. Swerdlow SH
      . WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. revised. 4th edn. Lyon, France: International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) Press, 2017.
    13. 13.↵
      1. Groves FD,
      2. Linet MS,
      3. Travis LB, et al
      . Cancer surveillance series: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence by histologic subtype in the United States from 1978 through 1995. J Natl Cancer Inst2000;92:1240–51.doi:10.1093/jnci/92.15.1240
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. 14.↵
      1. Bautista-Quach MA,
      2. Ake CD,
      3. Chen M, et al
      . Gastrointestinal lymphomas: morphology, immunophenotype and molecular features. J Gastrointest Oncol2012;3:209–25.doi:10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.024
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. 15.↵
      1. Morton JE,
      2. Leyland MJ,
      3. Vaughan Hudson G, et al
      . Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a review of 175 British National lymphoma investigation cases. Br J Cancer1993;67:776–82.doi:10.1038/bjc.1993.141
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    16. 16.↵
      1. Peng JC,
      2. Zhong L,
      3. Ran ZH
      . Primary lymphomas in the gastrointestinal tract. J Dig Dis2015;16:169–76.doi:10.1111/1751-2980.12234
      OpenUrl
    17. 17.↵
      1. Koch P,
      2. del Valle F,
      3. Berdel WE, et al
      . Primary Gastrointestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: I. Anatomic and Histologic Distribution, Clinical Features, and Survival Data of 371 Patients Registered in the German Multicenter Study GIT NHL 01/92. J Clin Oncol2001;19:3861–73.doi:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3861
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. 18.↵
      1. Cardona DM,
      2. Layne A,
      3. Lagoo AS
      . Lymphomas of the gastro-intestinal tract - pathophysiology, pathology, and differential diagnosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol2012;55:1–16.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. 19.↵
      1. Weeratunge CN,
      2. Bolivar HH,
      3. Anstead GM, et al
      . Primary esophageal lymphoma: a diagnostic challenge in acquired immunodeficiency Syndrome—Two case reports and review. South Med J2004;97:383–7.doi:10.1097/01.SMJ.0000100120.49153.3F
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. 20.↵
      1. Zhu Q,
      2. Xu B,
      3. Xu K, et al
      . Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the esophagus. J Dig Dis2008;9:241–4.doi:10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00354.x
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. 21.↵
      1. Fischbach W
      . Gastric MALT lymphoma – update on diagnosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol2014;28:1069–77.doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2014.09.006
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    22. 22.↵
      1. Du M-Q,
      2. Isaccson PG
      . Gastric MALT lymphoma: from aetiology to treatment. Lancet Oncol2002;3:97–104.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. 23.↵
      1. Nakamura S,
      2. Matsumoto T,
      3. Nakamura S
      . Chromosomal translocation t(11;18)(q21;q21) in gastrointestinal mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. J Clin Pathol2003;56:36–42.doi:10.1136/jcp.56.1.36
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. 24.↵
      1. Zullo A,
      2. Hassan C,
      3. Cristofari F
      . Gastric low-grade mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphoma: Helicobacter pylori and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol2010;2:181–6.doi:10.4251/wjgo.v2.i4.181
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. 25.↵
      1. Kolve M,
      2. Fischbach W,
      3. Greiner A, et al
      . Differences in endoscopic and clinicopathological features of primary and secondary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc1999;49:307–15.doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70006-4
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. 26.↵
      1. Ferreri AJM,
      2. Montalbán C
      . Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the stomach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol2007;63:65–71.doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.01.003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. 27.↵
      1. Ponzoni M,
      2. Ferreri AJM,
      3. Pruneri G, et al
      . Prognostic value of BCL-6, CD10 and CD38 immunoreactivity in stage I-II gastric lymphomas: identification of a subset of CD10+ large B-cell lymphomas with a favorable outcome. Int J Cancer2003;106:288–91.doi:10.1002/ijc.11179
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. 28.↵
      1. Hayashi D,
      2. Devenney-Cakir B,
      3. Lee JC, et al
      . Mucosa-Associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: multimodality imaging and histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol2010;195:W105–17.doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4105
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. 29.↵
      1. d'Amore F,
      2. Brincker H,
      3. Grønbaek K, et al
      . Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a population-based analysis of incidence, geographic distribution, clinicopathologic presentation features, and prognosis. Danish lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol1994;12:1673–84.doi:10.1200/JCO.1994.12.8.1673
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. 30.↵
      1. Zhu L,
      2. Wu G,
      3. Ghimire P, et al
      . Ct features of peripheral T-cell lymphoma in the gastrointestinal tract in Chinese population and literature review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol2012;56:143–50.doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02329.x
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. 31.↵
      1. Kim DH,
      2. Lee D,
      3. Kim JW, et al
      . Endoscopic and clinical analysis of primary T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract according to pathological subtype. J Gastroenterol Hepatol2014;29:934–43.doi:10.1111/jgh.12471
      OpenUrl
    32. 32.↵
      1. Ayub A,
      2. Rehmani S,
      3. Al-Ayoubi AM, et al
      . Primary Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma of the Gallbladder: Α Population-based Analysis. Anticancer Res2017;37:2581–6.doi:10.21873/anticanres.11602
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    33. 33.↵
      1. Honda M,
      2. Furuta Y,
      3. Naoe H, et al
      . Primary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the gallbladder and review of the literature. BMJ Case Rep2017;82:pii: bcr-2017-220161.doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-220161
    34. 34.↵
      1. Al-Katib S,
      2. Colvin R,
      3. Sokhandon F
      . Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma presenting with diffuse gallbladder wall thickening: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Radiol2018;2018:2494207doi:10.1155/2018/2494207
    35. 35.↵
      1. Zakaria A,
      2. Al-Obeidi S,
      3. Daradkeh S
      . Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the common bile duct: a case report and literature review. Asian J Surg2017;40:81–7.doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.09.009
      OpenUrl
    36. 36.↵
      1. Mouchli MA,
      2. Kurtin PJ,
      3. LaRusso NF
      . A 59-year-old man with new jaundice. Gastroenterology2018;154:2035–6.doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.003
      OpenUrl
    37. 37.↵
      1. Yu L,
      2. Chen Y,
      3. Xing L
      . Primary pancreatic lymphoma: two case reports and a literature review. Onco Targets Ther2017;10:1687–94.doi:10.2147/OTT.S121521
      OpenUrl
    38. 38.↵
      1. Kumar Padhan R,
      2. Padhan RK,
      3. Das P S
      . Primary hepatic lymphoma. Trop Gastroenterol2015;36:14–20.doi:10.7869/tg.239
      OpenUrl
    39. 39.↵
      1. Jaffe ES,
      2. Harris NL,
      3. Stein H, et al
      . Classification of lymphoid neoplasms: the microscope as a tool for disease discovery. Blood2008;112:4384–99.doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-077982
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. 40.↵
      1. Du M-Q,
      2. Atherton JC
      . Molecular subtyping of gastric MALT lymphomas: implications for prognosis and management. Gut2006;55:886–93.doi:10.1136/gut.2004.061663
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    41. 41.↵
      1. Welaya K,
      2. Casulo C
      . Follicular lymphoma: redefining prognosis, current treatment options, and unmet needs. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am2019;33:627–38.doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2019.03.003
      OpenUrl
    42. 42.↵
      1. Young RC,
      2. Longo DL,
      3. Glatstein E, et al
      . The treatment of indolent lymphomas: watchful waiting V aggressive combined modality treatment. Semin Hematol1988;25(2 Suppl 2):11–16.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    43. 43.↵
      1. Koniaris LG,
      2. Drugas G,
      3. Katzman PJ, et al
      . Management of gastrointestinal lymphoma. J Am Coll Surg2003;197:127–41.doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00002-4
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    44. 44.↵
      1. Zullo A,
      2. Hassan C,
      3. Cristofari F, et al
      . Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on early stage gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol2010;8:105–10.doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.017
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    45. 45.↵
      1. Matysiak-Budnik T,
      2. Fabiani B,
      3. Hennequin C, et al
      . Gastrointestinal lymphomas: French intergroup clinical practice recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFH). Dig Liver Dis2018;50:124–31.doi:10.1016/j.dld.2017.12.006
      OpenUrl
    46. 46.↵
      1. Thieblemont C,
      2. Zucca E
      . Clinical aspects and therapy of gastrointestinal MALT lymphoma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol2017;30:109–17.doi:10.1016/j.beha.2017.01.002
      OpenUrl
    47. 47.↵
      1. Tondini C,
      2. Balzarotti M,
      3. Santoro A, et al
      . Initial chemotherapy for primary resectable large-cell lymphoma of the stomach. Ann Oncol1997;8:497–9.doi:10.1023/A:1008206329583
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    48. 48.↵
      1. Ferrer AJM,
      2. Cordio S,
      3. Ponzoni M, et al
      . Non-surgical treatment with primary chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy, of stage I-II high-grade gastric lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma1999;33:531–41.doi:10.3109/10428199909058457
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    49. 49.↵
      1. Mishima Y,
      2. Terui Y,
      3. Yokoyama M, et al
      . R-CHOP with dose-attenuated radiation therapy could induce good prognosis in gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol Oncol2012;1.doi:10.1186/2162-3619-1-30
    50. 50.↵
      1. Lightner AL,
      2. Shannon E,
      3. Gibbons MM, et al
      . Primary Gastrointestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma of the Small and Large Intestines: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg2016;20:827–39.doi:10.1007/s11605-015-3052-4
      OpenUrl
    51. 51.↵
      1. Daum S,
      2. Ullrich R,
      3. Heise W, et al
      . Intestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study From the German Study Group on Intestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol2003;21:2740–6.doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.06.026
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    52. 52.↵
      1. Zing NPC,
      2. Fischer T,
      3. Zain J, et al
      . Peripheral T-cell lymphomas: incorporating new developments in diagnostics, prognostication, and treatment into clinical Practice-PART 2: ENKTL, EATL, indolent T-cell LDP of the Gi tract, ATLL, and Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. Oncology2018;32:e83–9.
      OpenUrl
    53. 53.↵
      1. Nijeboer P,
      2. Malamut G,
      3. Mulder CJ, et al
      . Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: improving treatment strategies. Dig Dis2015;33:231–5.doi:10.1159/000369542
      OpenUrl
    54. 54.↵
      1. Gleeson M,
      2. Peckitt C,
      3. To YM, et al
      . CHOP versus GEM-P in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CHEMO-T): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Haematol2018;5:e190–200.doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30039-5
      OpenUrl
    55. 55.↵
      1. Tatar C,
      2. Yavas M,
      3. Akkus O, et al
      . Intestinal perforation that developed after chemotherapy in a patient diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep2017;39:321–3.doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.08.058
      OpenUrl
    56. 56.↵
      1. Schizas D,
      2. Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I,
      3. Tsilimigras DI, et al
      . The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of primary gastric lymphoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract2017;2017:2397430doi:10.1155/2017/2397430
    57. 57.↵
      1. van Gils T,
      2. Nijeboer P,
      3. Overbeek LI, et al
      . Risks for lymphoma and gastrointestinal carcinoma in patients with newly diagnosed adult-onset celiac disease: consequences for follow-up: celiac disease, lymphoma and Gi carcinoma. United European Gastroenterol J2018;6:1485–95.doi:10.1177/2050640618800540
      OpenUrl
    58. 58.↵
      1. Elkholy S,
      2. Mogawer S,
      3. Farag A
      . Nodular Lymphoid Hyperplasia of the Gastrointestinal Tract : a comprehensive review. Acta Gastroenterol Belg2017;80:405–10.
      OpenUrl
    59. 59.↵
      1. Albuquerque A
      . Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia in the gastrointestinal tract in adult patients: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc2014;6:534–40.doi:10.4253/wjge.v6.i11.534
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Presented at The material in the paper was previously presented as an abstract at the WCG meeting in Orlando in 2017.

    • Contributors AST and EQ conceived the idea for the study and planned the study. AST collated the clinical and endoscopic data. MS collated and reviewed all pathology. AST drafted the manuscript which EQ and MS edited. All three authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

    • Funding This study was supported in part by a bequest to the Lynda K and David M Underwood Center for Digestive Disorders and the Josephine Hughes Sterling Foundation.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement There are no data in this work.