Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The Role of transanal (Ta) dissection in the management of difficult primary and recurrent rectal cancer
  1. Valérie Courval1,2,
  2. Sébastien Drolet1,2,
  3. Alexandre Bouchard1,2,
  4. Philippe Bouchard1,2
  1. 1Department of surgery, Local B1-520, 10 rue de L'Espinay, Pavillon St François d'Assise, CHU de Quebec, Quebec City, G1L 3L5, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2Department of surgery, Medical Faculty Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, bureau 4873, 1050 avenue de la Medecine, Laval University, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Quebec, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Valérie Courval, Department of surgery, local B1-520, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Pavillon St François-d'Assise, CHU de Quebec, Quebec city, G1L 3L5, Quebec, Canada; valerie.courval.1{at}ulaval.ca

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to review the postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes of our first cohort of patients having had a transanal (Ta) approach for primary or recurrent rectal cancer.

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all cases of Ta dissection occurring between 2013 and 2016. We reviewed data concerning case selection, tumour characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data and final pathology.

Results A total of 24 males were operated for primary (92% (22/24)) or recurrent rectal cancer (8.3% (2/24)). Four patients (16.7% (4/24)) had a history of previous rectal surgery and two had a history of previous Ta total mesorectal excision (TME). A majority of patients were obese, with 58.3% (14/24) having a body mass index >30. The laparoscopic approach was used in the majority of cases (95.8% (23/24)). Most patients had a low anterior resection (95.8% (23/24)). Sixteen patients received a temporary ileostomy (66.7% (16/24)). Three patients suffered perioperative complications (including colonic ischaemia, rectal perforation and arterial bleeding). Five patients (21.7% (5/23)) had an anastomotic leak treated with Ta drainage in two patients. Final pathology revealed negative margins in 95.8% (23/24). TME was considered complete in 87.5% (21/24) overall and in 95% (21/22) when considering only primary cancer cases.

Conclusion According to our cohort of selected difficult cases, Ta dissection approach helped achieve complete mesorectal excision in complex primary rectal cancer but also allowed for rectal resection in patients with previous rectal surgery. This technique also helped perform a primary anastomosis in these difficult cases.

  • surgical oncology
  • laparoscopic surgery
  • colorectal cancer

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors SD, AB, and VC planned the study. VC and SD conducted the survey. SD, AB, PB and VC wrote the articles. VC submitted the study.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.