Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Introduction Adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) show a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety, compared to youth with other chronic diseases. The inflammation-depression hypothesis might explain this association, and implies that treating depression can decrease intestinal inflammation and improve disease course. The present multicentre randomised controlled trial aims to test the effectiveness of an IBD-specific cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) protocol in reducing symptoms of subclinical depression and anxiety, while improving quality of life and disease course in adolescents with IBD.
Methods and analysis Adolescents with IBD (10–20 years) from 7 hospitals undergo screening (online questionnaires) for symptoms of depression and anxiety. Those with elevated scores of depression (Child Depression Inventory (CDI) ≥13 or Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) II ≥14) and/or anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders: boys ≥26, girls ≥30) receive a psychiatric interview. Patients meeting criteria for depressive/anxiety disorders are referred for psychotherapy outside the trial. Patients with elevated (subclinical) symptoms are randomly assigned to medical care-as-usual (CAU; n=50) or CAU plus IBD-specific CBT (n=50). Main outcomes: (1) reduction in depressive and/or anxiety symptoms after 3 months and (2) sustained remission for 12 months. Secondary outcomes: quality of life, psychosocial functioning, treatment adherence. In addition, we will assess inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood RNA expression profiles. For analysis, multilevel linear models and generalised estimating equations will be used.
Ethics and dissemination The Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC approved this study. If we prove that this CBT improves emotional well-being as well as disease course, implementation is recommended.
Trial registration number NCT02265588.
- INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
- PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS
- PSYCHOTHERAPY
- CROHN'S DISEASE
- ULCERATIVE COLITIS
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Background
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the intestine, with increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide.1 Patients have abdominal pain, bloody diarrhoea, often accompanied by systemic symptoms such as lack of appetite, weight loss and fatigue. IBD has a fluctuating course, with relapses (increased disease activity) and periods of clinical remission. In up to 25% of patients, IBD manifests during late childhood and adolescence.2–4 Adolescence is a challenging life phase, with significant psychological, physical and social changes. Having IBD during adolescence is a threat to healthy psychosocial development, making transition to adulthood more difficult.
Adolescent patients with IBD frequently experience psychological and social problems.5 They often have low self-esteem and report stress concerning their disease and future.6 In addition, their quality of life is reduced2 ,7 ,8 due to the unpredictable course of disease, embarrassing symptoms, frequent hospital visits or admissions and (side effects of) medical treatment. Furthermore, the possible extra intestinal manifestations (eg, primary sclerosing cholangitis, arthritis), complications (eg, strictures) and surgical treatments (eg, resections) reduce quality of life significantly.2 ,8–12
Depressive symptoms are common, and occur in 20–40% of adolescents with IBD.13–18 Anxiety, reported in 30–50% of adolescents with IBD, is even more common.7 ,19 In many young patients, symptoms of depression and anxiety occur together.20 ,21 Not surprisingly, early onset of mental health problems can predict poor long-term medical and psychological outcomes.22–24
Taken together, it is clear that psychological problems are often found in young patients with IBD. The inflammation–depression hypothesis has been proposed to explain the association between psychological problems and IBD, and implies that treating emotional symptoms can decrease intestinal inflammation, and thus, improve disease course.25 This hypothesis will be discussed in detail later in this paper.
Factors associated with depression and anxiety in IBD
Medical, psychological and family factors are associated with depression and anxiety in IBD and can influence the effectiveness of treatment of emotional problems in IBD. Known medical factors are: being recently diagnosed with IBD,26 a diagnosis of CD (vs UC),27 a history of surgery,27 ,28 active disease,26–32 non-adherence to therapy31 and IBS (like) symptoms.33 Psychological factors are: high levels of perceived stress,26 negative cognitive coping,15 low self-esteem8 ,34 and sleep disturbance.32 Family factors are: parental stress,35 ,36 low socioeconomic status,26 ,27 ,31 stressful life events37 and unhealthy family functioning.10 ,34 ,37 In paediatric patients, active disease15 ,18 ,19 ,38 ,39 and low socioeconomic status15 are associated with depression and/or anxiety.
In the opposite direction, emotional problems have also been shown to influence disease activity. Psychological stress can trigger a relapse in IBD30 ,40–44 and lead to a more difficult-to-treat (refractory) disease.30 Moreover, emotional problems decrease the ability to cope with physical symptoms, increase the sensitivity to abdominal pain,45 increase medical service use and decrease therapy adherence.16 ,19 ,29 ,46 ,47
Altogether, these findings emphasise the existence of a bidirectional relationship between emotional problems and disease activity in patients with IBD. We therefore expect that early recognition and treatment of emotional problems is necessary to improve both mental health and the clinical course of disease.
Inflammation–depression hypothesis
The ‘inflammation–depression hypothesis’ or ‘brain–gut hypothesis’ proposes that intestinal inflammation, by means of increased production of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α)), is known to directly and indirectly affect the brain and thereby increase symptoms of depression.48 It is also suggested that psychological stress can increase depressive symptoms by increasing inflammation.25 ,48 ,49
Most evidence for this hypothesis comes from animal studies in which experimental (psychological) stress has shown to induce and reactivate inflammation in colitis models.44 It is suggested that these stress-induced alterations in inflammation are mediated through changes in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function, and alterations in bacterial mucosal interactions.25 ,44 ,50–52 Similarly, human studies also show the proinflammatory effect of experimental25 ,50 and (early) life stress,52 and show elevated levels of inflammatory markers in depressed patients.49 ,53–56
There are few paediatric IBD studies examining the relationship between inflammation and depression.48 Furthermore, the brain–gut hypothesis mainly focuses on depression, the relation between inflammation and anxiety has been studied less extensively.57 Reviews by Hou and Baldwin58 and Salim et al59 show the existing evidence in animal models linking inflammation with anxiety. In humans, a chronic anxiety state has been shown to negatively affect immune function, and several studies report a positive correlation between anxiety and increased inflammatory markers.57–60 To the best of our knowledge, little is known about the association between anxiety and inflammation in IBD. The present study will contribute to more understanding of this association.19 ,31
CBT for adolescents with IBD
From all different psychotherapies, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most evidence-based psychotherapy to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression.12 ,61 ,62
For adolescents with IBD, Szigethy et al63 developed a disease-specific CBT programme called PASCET-PI (Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training—Physical Illness) (see Intervention section). They performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) (2007) in adolescents with IBD and subclinical depression (total N=41). A 40% reduction in depressive severity in the PASCET-PI group was found compared to the control group, receiving care-as-usual (CAU).17 These positive effects were maintained 1 year after treatment.23 However, anxiety was not addressed. Only a few paediatric studies have integrated the clinical course of disease or disease activity as an outcome parameter. Szigethy et al64 compared the effect of two different psychotherapies in paediatric patients with IBD with (sub)clinical depression and found that both therapies had a significant impact in improving depression, while CBT was associated with a greater reduction in disease activity. Reigada et al65 showed in a CBT-pilot with nine (paediatric) patients and only comorbid anxiety, that 90% no longer had an anxiety disorder and half the patients had a reduction in IBD severity.
Although the aforementioned studies showed promising results, larger scale randomised studies are necessary to evaluate the longitudinal effect of CBT in paediatric IBD, and to identify potential moderators of CBT success. To the best of our knowledge, at present, there are no RCTs assessing simultaneously the effect of CBT on the two psychological outcomes (symptoms of depression or anxiety) and the clinical course of disease in adolescents with IBD.
Aim and hypothesis
The aim of the present study is to test the effectiveness of the disease-specific CBT programme (PASCET-PI) in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescents with IBD in order to improve quality of life and to improve the clinical course of disease. We hypothesise that the PASCET-PI will reduce symptoms of both depression and anxiety, improve quality of life, reduce intestinal inflammation and will promote sustained clinical remission.
Methods and design
Study design
This study is a prospective, multicentre, RCT, with baseline screening (T0) and three follow-up assessments (T1–T3). At baseline, adolescents (aged 10–20 years) with IBD are screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety by means of an online questionnaire. Patients with elevated (subclinical) symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, but no clinical disorder, are randomised into two conditions. The control condition entails standard medical CAU; psychological care is not standard in the Dutch medical care system. Patients in the experimental condition receive standard medical care plus the disease-specific CBT (PASCET-PI). Patients are recruited from two academic hospitals and five community hospitals in the South-West region of the Netherlandsi. The design of this study is following the CONSORT guidelines for RCTs.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria are: (1) patients between 10 and 20 years of age with diagnosed IBD and (2) informed consent provided by patients and (if applicable) parents.
Exclusion criteria are: (1) mental retardation (parent report); (2) current psychopharmacological treatment for depression or anxiety; (3) current psychological treatment; (4) having received manualised CBT in the past year (at least 8 sessions); (5) insufficient mastery of the Dutch language; (6) diagnosed bipolar disorder, schizophrenia/psychotic disorder, autism spectrum disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic, acute stress-disorder or substance use disorder; (7) selective mutism (physician reported) and (8) already participating in an intervention study.
Recruitment and procedure
See figure 1 for an overview of the procedure. The treating (paediatric) gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner or physician assistant informs eligible patients about this study and hands out the written patient information. Parents are asked for informed consent if patients are younger than 18 years; if patients aged 18 years or older still live in their parents’ house, participation of parents is optional. After having given informed consent, patients (and parents) receive an e-mail with online questionnaires (table 1). If this screening shows self-reported subclinical symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, a patient is selected for further participation in the study. The Dutch versions of the Child Depression Inventory (CDI; ages 10–17 years),66 Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; ages 18–20 years),67 are used to assess depressive symptoms, whereas the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED; ages 10–20)68 is used to assess anxiety symptoms. Subclinical depressive symptoms are defined as a score equal to or above the cut-off on the CDI (13)66 or the BDI-II (14).67 Subclinical anxiety symptoms are defined as: (1) a score equal to or above the cut-off on the total scale of the SCARED (26 for boys, 30 for girls) or (2) a score equal to or above the cut-off (8) on one of the subscales.69
Outcomes, covariates, instruments and informants at each time point
Flow chart study design (ADIS-C/P, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule—Child and Parent Version; ADRS, Adolescent Depression Rating Scale; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition; CDI, Child Depression Inventory; CDRS-R, Child Depression Rating Scale—Revised; PARS, Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale; SCARED, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders).
Next, in patients with these subclinical symptoms, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule—Child and Parent Version (ADIS-C/P)70 ,71 is administered by a research psychologist by telephone. Thereafter, the severity of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms is rated by the research psychologist using the Child Depression Rating Scale—Revised (CDRS-R; ages 10–12 years),72 the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS; ages 13–20 years)73 and the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS; ages 10–20 years).74 Patients are excluded for randomisation if they meet criteria for a clinical depressive or anxiety disorder on the ADIS-C/P and score equal to or above the clinical cut-off on the CDRS (40),75 ADRS (20)73 or PARS (18).74 Instead, these patients are referred for attuned psychological treatment, since it would be unethical to randomise them. For patients with subclinical depression and/or anxiety, the medical researcher performs the randomisation and arranges the medical baseline assessment.
All patients included in our study are well phenotyped with regard to duration and severity of disease, age at diagnosis, growth and pubertal development, clinical course of disease, number and type of surgical interventions and hospitalisations. The Paris classification is collected at diagnosis and from the most recent endoscopy, to see if extension of disease has occurred.
Randomisation and blinding
Patients are allocated to PASCET-PI or CAU group by means of computer-based, block randomisation, stratified per centre. Sealed envelopes sequentially numbered are provided by the Department of Biostatistics of the Erasmus Medical Center. Participants assigned to the treatment group start treatment within a maximum of 4 weeks.
To prevent bias in the assessment, the research psychologist completing the diagnostic interviews at T0–T3 is blinded for the outcome of randomisation. In addition, physicians assessing the patient's disease activity are blinded. The patients and therapists are asked not to discuss the psychotherapy with the treating physician. Unblinding takes place if patients are excluded from the study (either by withdrawal or an acute need for care).
Intervention
The PASCET-PI focuses on behavioural activation, cognitive restructuring and problem-solving skills to change maladaptive behaviours, cognitions and coping strategies.61 Although originally designed to treat depression, most of the components of PASCET-PI are common for all CBT protocols, and have much overlap with components of CBT protocols specifically designed for anxiety (except for a fear hierarchy). Therefore, PASCET-PI can also be properly used for anxiety. Disease-specific components encompass the illness narrative (ie, perceptions and experience of having IBD), therapy for pain and immune functioning, disease-specific psychoeducation, social skills training and emphasis on IBD-related cognitions and behaviours. Parents are provided with psychoeducation about being a CBT-coach helping their child coping with IBD.17 ,89
The PASCET-PI consists of 10 weekly sessions, delivered in 3 months (table 2). Six sessions are face to face (1 h), and four sessions are telephone sessions (30 min). Three parental sessions are held at the beginning, middle and end of treatment. For adult patients (≥18 years) who still live with their parents, this is recommended but voluntarily. Adult patients who do not live with their parents, participate without their parents. Thereafter, three 30 min booster sessions (one per month) are provided by telephone. For the current study, the original PASCET-PI was translated into the Dutch language. During this study, patients will receive medical care according to the current guidelines. Psychological interventions, other than the PASCET-PI for the intervention group, are not allowed.
Outline of the PASCET-PI61
Training and protocol adherence
Before providing the PASCET-PI, all licensed (healthcare) psychologists had followed a PASCET-PI training (developed and given by EMS). To prevent protocol drifting they receive monthly PASCET-PI supervision by a senior clinical psychologist. All treatment sessions are audiotaped, and a random 20% is rated by independent raters (senior clinical psychologist and master's Psychology students) using the PASCET-PI Protocol Adherence Checklist (PPAC).63
Outcome measures
In table 1, an overview of all variables and instruments at each time point is provided, with informants specified. All the psychological questionnaires used are (inter)nationally validated instruments, for which psychometric properties have been established in the Netherlands. Owing to the lack of space, instruments for the main psychological and medical outcomes are described in detail below. Instruments for secondary outcomes and covariates are mentioned only. Covariates will be analysed as either confounder, mediator or moderator.
Main psychological outcome measures: changes in symptoms of depression and anxiety
Changes in symptoms of depression are assessed by the CDI and the BDI-II (to cover the complete age range). The CDI (used for ages 10–17 years) is a 27-item self-report scale (response categories 0–2: total score 0–54). It has excellent reliability (Cronbach's α >0.85), and moderate to good validity.66 The BDI-II (used for ages 18–20 years) is a 21-item self-report scale (response categories 0–3: total score 0–63). The BDI-II has excellent reliability (Cronbach's α >0.85) and good to excellent validity.67 In addition (changes in) the severity of the depressive symptoms will be rated with the CDRS-R or the ADRS. The CDRS-R (used for ages 10–12 years) is one of the most used rating scales for depression in children.72 The ADRS (used for ages 13–20 years) is developed specifically for adolescent depression.73 Changes in symptoms of depression are analysed using Z-scores of CDI and BDI-II, and CDRS-R and ADRS.
Changes in symptoms of anxiety are assessed by the SCARED (used for ages 10–20 years), a 69-item screening instrument (response categories 0–2: total score 0–138) containing five subscales: general anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, panic disorder and social phobia. Cronbach's α in the normative sample is 0.92 for the total score and between 0.66 and 0.87 for the subscales. Satisfactory concurrent validity has been shown.68 In addition, changes in the severity of anxiety symptoms will be rated with the PARS,74 for which a high internal consistency has been reported.75
For both depression and anxiety, the semistructured interview ADIS-C/P (child and parent version) is administered. This diagnostic interview assesses diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV symptoms are reviewed as either present (‘Yes’) or absent (‘No’).70 ,71
Main medical outcome measure: sustained remission at 12 months
Sustained remission of IBD (absence of clinical relapse) is continued clinical remission with no relapses, without the need to escalate treatment, use of new induction treatment (except for the first 8 weeks after baseline), hospitalise or perform bowel surgery during the first 12 months. In case of active disease at the time of enrolment, sustained remission at 12 months means continued remission after 8 weeks of induction treatment starting at baseline. The PCDAI and the PUCAI are used to score disease activity, and to score remission or relapse. The PCDAI (for CD) is a validated, multi-item, physician-reported measure that comprises items on history (abdominal pain, stools, activity level), physical examination, height and weight, as well as laboratory parameters. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more active disease.90 ,91 The PUCAI is a clinical index on disease activity for UC, scored by the physician, which has been validated in multiple international drug studies and comprises items on abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, stool frequency and consistency and activity level. Scores range from 0 to 85, with higher scores representing more active disease.92 For patients with CD and UC, remission is defined as PCDAI <10 and PUCAI <10, respectively. For CD, relapse is defined as PCDAI >30 or an increase of >15 points and intensification of medical treatment. For UC, relapse is defined as PUCAI >34 or an increase of ≥20 points for UC and intensification of medical treatment.90 ,92 ,93
Secondary outcomes
Secondary psychological outcomes are IBD-related quality of life and social functioning.
Secondary medical outcomes are disease activity, inflammatory markers in blood (C reactive protein) and stool (calprotectin), use of IBD medication and necessity of surgery (see table 1).
Psychological and medical covariates
Several factors associated with depression and anxiety in IBD (eg, IBS-like symptoms, cognitive coping, parental stress) will be assessed because they can confound, mediate or moderate the effect of CBT on medical and psychological outcomes. Psychological covariates assessed are: illness perception, cognitive coping, quality of sleep, parental anxiety and/or depression, stressful life events, family functioning, and demographic factors.
Medical covariates encompass: disease phenotype, treatment strategy, disease activity, and IBS-like symptoms. Blood samples for immunological analysis will be drawn at baseline and after 3 months. For cytokine analysis, one EDTA tube (10 mL) will be drawn. PBMCs will be isolated and the plasma stored at −80°C. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8) will be assessed in plasma and supernatant of PBMCs in culture using, respectively, Cytokine Bead Analysis or ELISA. Furthermore, intracellular flow cytometry will be performed on in vitro-stimulated PBMCs. For the RNA expression analysis, 2.5 mL venous blood will be collected in PAXgene tubes (PreAnalytiX) and stored at −20°C until RNA extraction. Total cellular RNA will be extracted using the PAXgeneTM blood RNA kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Gene expression profiles of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory genes in peripheral blood leucocytes will be assessed by Affymetrix U133 2.0 plus GeneChips.
Data collection: follow-up assessments
Follow-up assessments take place at similar moments in the CBT and CAU group: 3 (T1), 6 (T2) and 12 (T3) months after randomisation. Each follow-up assessment consists of a regular medical visit and a psychological assessment (online questionnaires and diagnostic psychiatric interview) for the patient and, if applicable, parents. Patients with a clinical depressive or anxiety disorder (according to the same criteria as at baseline), or with an urgent need of psychological help, are excluded. To ensure participation throughout the study, patients receive a small reward after completing the last follow-up assessment.
Withdrawal
Patients can withdraw from the study without any consequences at any time for any reason. Those who withdraw are asked to complete the follow-up assessments.
Sample size
The target population is a group of approximately 350 patients with IBD aged 10–20 years. Basing on our previous studies concerning psychological problems in physically ill adolescents, the expected response rate will be above 80%,94 which corresponds with ±280 patients. Basing on literature, around 40% of adolescents with IBD will suffer from increased symptoms of depression or anxiety. Of those patients 10% will experience clinical depression or anxiety. Of the remaining ±100 patients, 50 patients will be randomised to the treatment condition (CBT and CAU) and 50 to CAU. Sample size is based on two-tailed tests with size of α=0.05 using a repeated measures design with estimated correlation between time points of 0.6. For the effect of CBT on symptoms of depression, small-effect to medium-effect sizes are expected (Cohen's d >0.3),95 ,96 for the effect on symptoms of anxiety medium-effect to large-effect sizes are expected (Cohen's d >0.6).97 ,98 For the effect of CBT on sustainment of remission (no clinical relapse), a medium-effect size is expected (ω=0.3). Basing on clinical experience in our hospital, in the CAU group, 40% of patients will have sustained remission during 12 months. We hypothesise that 70% of patients will have sustained remission in the treatment group, reflecting a medium-effect size. Using the target population of N=100 and the estimated effects on depression, anxiety and sustainment of remission, we will have sufficient power (>0.85).
Statistical analyses
The main analyses will be conducted using an intention-to-treat approach. Where appropriate, secondary analysis will be conducted using a per-protocol basis. To test the effectiveness of the PASCET-PI, we will compare the CBT group with the CAU group on (1) change in symptoms of depression and anxiety and (2) sustained remission (absence of clinical relapse). For (1) multilevel linear models will be used, for (2) a generalised estimating equation (GEE) approach will be used. Covariates (eg, illness perception, cognitive coping, disease phenotypes, medical treatment strategy, inflammatory markers) will be included into the multilevel linear models and the GEE to identify which factors influence the effectiveness of the disease-specific CBT. Multiple imputation will be used to deal with missing values.
Discussion
PASCET-PI has proven to be effective in reducing depression in adolescents with IBD. However, the effect on anxiety, quality of life and disease course has hardly been studied systematically. We will perform a prospective RCT to examine the effectiveness of the PASCET-PI on both symptoms of depression and anxiety, on quality of life, and on clinical course of the inflammatory disease.
This study has several strengths. First, as this study examines the effect of disease-specific CBT on both psychological problems and disease course, it will provide insight to the complex interplay between inflammation and depression or anxiety in paediatric patients. We will study possible effects of reduction in depression or anxiety on cytokine expression and RNA expression profiles before and after CBT for subclinical depression or anxiety. Second, the disease-specific CBT will target both depression and anxiety, which is important, as these problems have a negative impact on medication adherence and long-term medical and psychological outcomes.16 ,19 ,23 ,24 ,29 ,45–47 Third, this study will provide important information about the prevalence of depression and anxiety among adolescents with IBD in an European country, such as the Netherlands, as compared to other studies that were performed mainly in the USA. Cultural differences may play a role in coping with disease-related anxiety and depression. Fourth, the PASCET-PI encompasses IBD-specific components, which matches patients’ IBD-related concerns and problems very well. If proven effective, the PASCET-PI can be very helpful for treatment of current and also for prevention of future psychological problems. A fifth strength of the study is the random and longitudinal nature of the design. Patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control condition. It is known that academic hospitals treat more severe IBD cases than community hospitals. Therefore, the randomisation will be stratified for academic versus community hospitals. Randomised patients will complete several follow-up assessments, which allows us to evaluate long-term effects of the PASCET-PI.
In conclusion, there is a compelling need to improve the emotional well-being of the adolescents with IBD who suffer from (subclinical) depression or anxiety symptoms. If the PASCET-PI proves to be effective in treating both subclinical depression and anxiety, in improving quality of life, and in preventing clinical relapse, screening for and treatment of psychological problems in adolescents with IBD should be incorporated in standard care.
References
Footnotes
GvdB and LS contributed equally and share first authorship.
Contributors JCE and EMWJU designed and supervised the trial. HEM and JH wrote the grant proposals and helped in designing the trial. GvdB and LS drafted this paper, which was edited and modified by JCE, EMWJU, EMS, HEM and JH. EMWJU translated the PASCET-PI treatment manual and is responsible for supervision of the psychologists. EMS also contributed to the design of the trial and trained the psychologists on-site. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This research is externally funded by grant applications of the following non-commercial Dutch foundations: Stichting Theia (grant number 2013201), Fonds NutsOhra (grant number 1303-012), Stichting Crohn en Colitis Ulcerosa Fonds Nederland (grant number 14.307.04), Stichting Vrienden van het Sophia. The funders did not have any influence in the design and execution of the trial.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC and confirmed by the institutional ethics review committees of the participating hospitals. All study data and human material will be handled confidentially and coded with a unique study number. Only the research team will have access to the data.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
↵i Erasmus MC(-Sophia), Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Haga (Juliana Children's) Hospital, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Maasstad Hospital, Amphia Hospital, and Albert Schweitzer Hospital.