Pharmacoeconomic health policyOriginal researchEconomic Burden Associated With Patients Diagnosed With Hepatitis C
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major medical and public health concern in the United States and worldwide. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate the prevalence of chronic HCV infection in the United States at between 2.7 and 3.9 million Americans (1.3%–1.9%).1 Chronic HCV infection is also a significant health care economic burden. The estimated aggregate cost associated with viral infection in the United States was $1.8 billion in 1997, and these costs are expected to increase significantly over the next 2 decades.2, 3, 4 Although serious and costly complications of HCV infection may develop, such as liver failure, the need for liver transplantation, and cancer, patients with chronic HCV infections may delay treatment until after symptoms emerge because of the significant direct and indirect costs associated with current treatments.5, 6
The use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin has been shown to be cost-effective, and even cost-saving in a number of clinical scenarios, but treatment with these drugs can result in a significant patient burden.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 New therapeutic alternatives are being developed that are associated with greater sustained virologic response, with a focus on the most prevalent genotype 1 patients.13, 14 However, the cost of the new therapies may emerge as one of the major barriers to widespread use. New therapies must undergo rigorous cost-effectiveness evaluations by pharmacy and therapeutics committees before they are adopted by health insurers and government agencies. These analyses require current and valid measures of the incremental cost of HCV infections for patients.
Most research into HCV-related costs has estimated the incremental costs of HCV infection relative to the general population without taking into account the advanced age and other cost-related factors that exist in the HCV population.15, 16, 17 As a result, the incremental costs can be overestimated unless adjustments are made for these factors. Rosenberg et al15 used cross-sectional data for 191 nonelderly HCV-infected patients selected from a large insured New England population. The average cost per newly diagnosed chronic HCV patient was estimated to be $10,812 per patient-year. Poret et al16 used the MarketScan fee-for-service database and found the cost per patient in the pre-HCV infection period is highest in the 6 months immediately preceding the diagnosis ($4594), and the highest level of spending in the post-HCV period occurred in the first 6 months ($6290). The annual costs across the 24 months before and after the index HCV diagnosis were $6945 and $10,100 per year, respectively. Armstrong and Charland17 selected 614 patients from a small health maintenance organization who had at least 2 HCV-related diagnoses and 1 year of eligibility following diagnosis using data from a 3-year data window (CY 1997–1999). Costs for this HCV patient sample were compared across 4 groups based on the type of treatment: no drug therapy, interferon-alfa (IFN-α) only, IFN-α + ribavirin (R), and a combination of IFN-α only and IFN-α + R. Most patients (45/614 = 88.8%) were untreated during the year following their index diagnosis. Untreated patients were less costly to treat ($4663); 37% ($1705) of their cost was for HCV-related medical service. Receiving the standard-of-care drug regimen (IFN-α + R only) was correlated with significantly higher total cost ($17,768), which can be broken down into medical cost with an HCV diagnosis ($9212) and the cost of IFN-α + R ($3305).
Two recent studies investigate the incremental health impact of HCV infection relative to a matched, non–HCV-infected population. Steinke et al18 conducted a case-control study of HCV and non-HCV patients. Their research found that HCV increased the risk of death 8-fold over a 7-year period and tripled both the average number of admissions per patient (4.7 vs 1.5) and readmissions per admitted patient (5.0 vs 1.6). Butt et al19 used a matched cohort of HCV-infected and -uninfected Veterans Affairs (VA) patients who were identified using the VA data system. The presence of an HCV infection was estimated to increase the risk of death by 37%. Treatment duration was estimated to decrease monotonically the likelihood of death among treated patients relative to untreated patients as follows: 0 to 23 weeks of treatment, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71; 24 to 47 weeks, HR = 0.60; 48+ weeks, HR = 0.41. However, neither study included data on the incremental health care costs attributable to HCV or the effect of HCV on adverse HCV-related events, such as cirrhosis, hepatic cancer, or liver transplantation.
This study estimates the incremental cost of chronic HCV infection by comparing matched HCV and non-HCV patients derived from a commercially insured population in the United States in order to improve the quality of data regarding the incremental costs associated with HCV infection. Specifically, we hypothesize that patients diagnosed with HCV will exhibit significantly higher treatment costs and an increased risk for adverse clinical events in the first year following diagnosis when compared with matched patients with no HCV diagnosis. The study was not designed to estimate the effects of treatment or to compare the effectiveness of alternative therapies. Instead, the results from this study provide a better understanding of the economic and health burden of HCV infection. Current cost-of-illness data are required by pharmacy and therapeutics committees and policy makers when evaluating the comparative effectiveness of treatments and deciding on future access to the new therapies for HCV that are currently approaching market approval by the Food and Drug Administration.
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
Data for this study were derived from a large health insurance company in the United States that provides a range of insurance plans to commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid patients. The data consisted of commercially available, de-identified, paid claims for all enrollees covered over a 6-year period (2003–2008). Since HCV infection frequently goes undiagnosed for long periods after the initial infection, 6 years of data were used to increase the likelihood that an infected patient enrolled with
Results
Table I presents data on the number of health plan enrollees in each of the 6 years for which data were available (7.8 million to 8.4 million). Only a small fraction of enrollees were previously diagnosed with an HCV infection (range 0.17%–0.25%), which can be translated roughly into an estimated incidence of HCV ranging between 0.03% and 0.06% per year. A total of 60,806 HCV patients were identified using the 6 years of paid claims data based on 2 or more HCV-related diagnoses or a single
Discussion
These study results document the substantial incremental cost burden of infection attributable to HCV for commercially insured patients in the United States. In an era of cost containment, it is essential to develop accurate measures of these incremental costs, as commercial insurance pharmacy and therapeutics committees and governmental programs prepare to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of new therapies expected to be approved in the near future, such as direct-acting antiviral therapy.
Limitations
This study has several important limitations. First, the incidence and prevalence rates presented in Table I likely underestimate the true incidence and prevalence of HCV infections. The acute phase of an HCV infection is frequently undetected because the symptoms are mild and nonspecific. The diagnosis of HCV is often made incidentally during the treatment of other medical conditions or from a review of routine blood tests. The reported cost estimates of the incremental cost of HCV infection
Conclusion
Although the relative decline of new HCV infections in the United States represents an important public health victory, health care expenditures generated by the aging population with chronic infection are still escalating. Approximately 3.2 million persons in the United States have chronic hepatitis C infections, but this figure might be underestimated because incarcerated or homeless persons at the highest risk are not accounted for in earlier research. Moreover, most diagnosed patients are
Acknowledgments
The financial resources for this analysis were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb in the form of consultancies for Drs. McCombs, Shin, and Saab. Dr. Yuan is an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr.Saab is on the Speaker Bureau and has served on Advisory Boards for Merck Pharmaceutical, Genentech, and Three-Rivers. He is also a consultant to Merck Pharmaceutical and Genentech. Drs. McCombs and Yuan were responsible for the design of the study. Drs. McCombs, Yuan, and Shin were responsible for
References (24)
- et al.
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Treatment of hepatitis C
Am J Med
(2005) - et al.
Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection: effectiveness at general population level in a highly endemic area
Dig Liver Dis
(2009) Viral hepatitis: statistics and surveillance
- et al.
Cost of hepatitis C
Arch Intern Med
(2001) - et al.
Consequences of hepatitis C virus (HCV)Cost of a baby boomer epidemic of liver disease
(2009) - et al.
Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States
Am J Public Health
(2000) - et al.
Reasons why patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus choose to defer treatment: do they alter their decision with time?
Dig Dis Sci
(2007) - et al.
Barriers to the treatment of hepatitis CPatient, provider, and system factors
J Gen Intern Med
(2005) - et al.
Treating hepatitis C in the prison population is cost-saving
Hepatology
(2008)
Cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in an evolving patient population
JAMA
Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C
Gut
Cited by (40)
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Hepatitis C Virus Treatments in Egyptian Cirrhotic and Noncirrhotic Patients: A Societal Perspective
2017, Value in Health Regional IssuesCitation Excerpt :Clinical trials have assayed a wide range of different sofosbuvir (SOF)-based options on HCV-infected population samples with varying characteristics. HCV infection imposes a substantial economic burden on Egypt health care resources each year [9,10]. Hepatitis C–related morbidity and mortality are predicted to at least double in the coming 20 years.
Economic Impact and Complications of Treated and Untreated Hepatitis C Virus Patients in Turkey
2015, Value in Health Regional IssuesCitation Excerpt :In 2002, the number of estimated HCV-related deaths in Europe was 86,000 [3]. HCV doubles the risk of depression, increases the risk of HCC 25-fold, the risk of needing a liver transplant more than 60-fold, and the risk of cirrhosis 80-fold [25]. Existing literature indicates that chronic HCV infection lowers work productivity, increases health care utilization, and is associated with an elevated risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality [15].
Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Hospital-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review
2024, Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologyThe Costs of Hepatitis C by Liver Disease Stage: Estimates from the Veterans Health Administration
2019, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy