Table 4

The total patient population was evaluated for the effect of four confounding factors (primary tumour location, metastatic status, age and gender) known to have an effect on general survival

 Patients without cachexiaPatients with cachexiaComparison
(A) Overall definition by Fearon et al
Primary location p=0.1018
 Head/neck/breast9/26 (35%)17/26 (65%) 
 GI tract27/109 (25%)82/109 (75%) 
 Lung14/32 (44%)18/32 (56%) 
Metastasen p=0.8094
 No15/54 (28%)39/54 (72%) 
 Yes35/113 (31%)78/113 (69%) 
 Age (SD)63.53 (10.99)64.15 (11.1)p=0.7255
Gender p=0.2756
 Female20/55 (36%)35/55 (64%) 
 Male30/112 (27%)82/112 (73%) 
(B) Overall definition by Evans et al
Primary location  p=0.4110
 Head/neck/breast18/26 (69%)8/26 (31%)
 GI tract62/109 (57%)47/109 (43%)
 Lung21/32 (66%)11/32 (34%)
Metastasen  p=0.3363
 No36/54 (67%)18/54 (33%)
 Yes65/113 (57%)48/113 (42%)
 Age (SD)62.81 (11.11)65.72 (10.77)p=0.0695
Gender  p=0.1536
 Female38/55 (69%)17/55 (31%)
 Male63/112 (56%)49/112 (44%)
  • The presence of differences between the cachectic group and the non-cachectic group was evaluated for the definition of Fearon et al in A and for the definition of Evans et al in B. The cachectic group contains patients who were diagnosed as cachectic at minimum one consult and the non-cachectic group contains patients who were never diagnosed as cachectic along the five consults. All the effects of confounding factors are not significant.

  • GI, gastrointestinal.