Table 1

Studies on the beneficial or deleterious effect of NSBBs on advanced cirrhosis

Author, year, RefDesign (n)End pointCharacteristics (RA)Presence of oesophageal varices non-BB vs BBCPT-C non-BB vs BB (%)MAP non-BB vs BBDoses BBFollow-up (month)HROther outcomes
Sertsé et al 201052Observational
Prospective, 151
Long-term survivalRA (100%)4% vs 100%61% vs 74%123 vs 103114 mg/day8 mHR 2.61 (1.63 to 4.19)1-year probability survival propranolol 19%vs 64% p <0.0001
Mandorfer et al 201470Observational
Retrospective, 607 (182 SBP)
Impact of SBP on BB on survivalSBP (NS)60% vs 94%53% vs 67%83 vs 77NS9.6 (147 person year)HR 1.64 (1.1 to 2.3)Patients with SBP on BB increase in mortality risk of 58%
Leithead et al 201571Observational
Retrospective, 322 (208 matched)
MortalityAscites on transplant list (117 (76 matched, 36.5%))Previous variceal haemorrhage
29% vs 29%
NS89 vs 8674.8% P (80 mg/day)
25.2% C (6.25 mg/day)
2.4 (72 days)HR 0.55 (0.32 to 0.95)
RA: HR 0.35 (0.14 to 0.86)
Mortality after listing 23.2% BB vs 34.8% no-BB
Bossen et al 201575Post hoc
Analysis of 3 RCT, 1188
Mortality or hospitalisationAscites in RCT of satavaptan/placebo
588 (49%)
559 BB users (46%)
Previous variceal haemorrhage
13% vs 30%
28% vs 24%85 vs 83159 high dose (>80 mg/day) P
or >6.25 mg/day C
12 (52 weeks)0.92 (0.72 to 1.18)
RA: 1.02 (0.74 to 1.40)
HR high dose vs no-BB users 0.8 (0.55 to 1.20)
HR low dose vs no-BB users 0.98 (0.72 to 1.13)
Mookerjee et al 201631Observational prospective, 349Mortality at 28 daysACLF (NS)NS. Previous gastrointestinal bleeding 17% vs 58%NS79 vs 7840 mg/day (68%)12 (56 weeks)0.60 (0.36 to 0.98)1-year mortality NSBB vs no-NSBB 52% vs 56% p=0.35
Gianelli et al 201682Observational, retrospective 526Cirrhotic cardiomyopathyTransplant waitlist (NS)NSNSNSNSNSNSSystolic dysfunction was higher in MELD>25 with BB, and similar in MELD<25 regardless BB
Aday et al 201672Retrospective, 2419
Propensity matching score on
In-hospital mortalityPortal hypertension (100%)51% vs 49%Severe ascites no BB 62% vs 37% on BBNSNSNSNSThe highest mortality was among those with cirrhosis and severe ascites no-BB (23.2%, compared with 6.5% BB)
Robins et al 201474Observational retrospective, 114SurvivalCirrhosis undergoing elective paracentesis (100%)54% vs 100%64% vs 64%NS.48.9 mg/dayMedian 10 (2–72)NSMedian survival BB vs no-BB 18 vs 11 months p=0.93
Kim et al 201468Nested case–control, 2250Association BB-AKIRA on transplant list (NS)NSNSNSNSMedian 20.3 (3–201)NS
Bhutta et al 201676Prospective analysis, 717SurvivalAscites17% vs 31%NSNSNSNSNSSurvival 58 days in BB vs 32 days n-BB
Chirapongsathorn et al 201623Meta-analysis 3 RCT and 8 observational studies, 3145MortalityAscites
443 (14%)
NSNSNSNSNSRR: 0.95 (0.67 to 1.35)
RA: 0.95 (0.57 to 1.61).
Mortality rate 6 months BB vs no-BB 52% vs 42.5%
RR 1.37 (0.94 to 1.98)
Kalambokis et al 201667Observational retrospective, 171MortalityAscitesNSNSNSNS3 yearsNSMedian survival
Kimer et al 201573Retrospective cohort, 61In-hospital mortalityAscites 31% vs 82%*NSNSMedian
80 mg/day
∼3.5 yearsNSNo difference in survival. Complications 76% no-BB vs 78% BB
  • *Thirty-seven per cent of patients in non-BB group and 13% in the BB group were not characterised with oesophageal endoscopy.

  • ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; AKI, acute kidney injury; BB, β-blockers; C, carvedilol; CP, Child-Pugh Class; CPT, Child-Push Turcotte; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MELD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease; NS, not stated; NSBB, non-selective β-blocker; P, propranolol; RA, refractory ascites; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RR, relative risk; SBP, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.